Aircraft Door Interlock Cam Assembly for Arming Sequence Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing aircraft door emergency support systems lack efficient mechanisms for controlling their active or inactive conditions, leading to potential misuse or malfunction during emergencies.

Innovation Solution

An interlock assembly with a shaft, interlock cam, and auto-disarm cam, allowing for selective configuration of the emergency support system to be armed or disarmed, preventing inadvertent activation during door opening.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the emergency support system is always active, then emergency evacuation capability is improved, but the risk of accidental activation and misuse increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemergency evacuation capabilityVSAvoidaccidental activation risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system requires preliminary actions (rotating the interior door handle to unlock the shaft, then rotating the exterior door handle to disengage the auto-disarm cam) before the emergency support system can be activated. This preliminary sequence ensures that only intentional actions, not accidental movements, will arm the system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The interlock cam and locking sector create a preliminary blocking mechanism that prevents the shaft from rotating into the armed position unless the door is properly closed and latched. This anti-action is built into the mechanical structure to counteract accidental activation attempts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

2Object-affected harmful factors

If the emergency support system is always inactive, then the risk of misuse is reduced, but the response time during actual emergencies increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemisuse riskVSAvoidemergency response time
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system is pre-configured with the shaft in the armed position during normal door closure, requiring only a simple disengagement action (rotating the exterior door handle) during emergencies rather than requiring activation steps. This preliminary arming state enables rapid response while maintaining safety during normal operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically transitions between armed and disarmed states based on door position and handle rotation, allowing the emergency support system to be ready for immediate activation when needed while remaining inactive during normal operations. The mechanical interlocks automatically adjust the system state based on operational conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If a simple on/off control mechanism is used, then the device complexity is reduced, but the precision of control over emergency system activation is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol mechanism complexityVSAvoidactivation control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The control mechanism is segmented into distinct functional components: the interior door handle with interlock first portion for unlocking the shaft, the exterior door handle with auto-disarm second portion for disengaging the cam, and the shaft with interlock and auto-disarm cams. Each segment performs a specific function in the activation sequence, providing precise control while keeping individual components relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The shaft acts as an intermediary mechanical element that transmits and coordinates the actions of both door handles. The interlock cam and auto-disarm cam on the shaft mediate between the handle rotations and the final armed/disarmed state, ensuring precise control through mechanical coordination rather than complex electronic control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Ease of operation

If the door handles are independently rotatable, then the ease of operation is improved, but the reliability of preventing inadvertent activation is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor handle operationVSAvoidinadvertent activation prevention
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The interlock cam on the shaft creates a preliminary blocking action that prevents the shaft from rotating into the armed position unless the interior door handle has first been rotated to unlock the interlock first portion. This anti-action mechanism works alongside the independent handle rotation to prevent inadvertent activation while maintaining ease of legitimate operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The system requires a preliminary action (rotating the interior door handle to move the interlock first portion and unlock the shaft) before the exterior door handle can effectively disengage the auto-disarm cam and arm the system. This preliminary step ensures that independent handle rotation does not accidentally activate the emergency support system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12497153B2Interlock assembly for an aircraft door
Publication Date: 2025.12.16 ROHR INC
  • US12497153B2 patent drawing
  • US12497153B2 patent drawing
  • US12497153B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An interlock assembly for an aircraft door includes a shaft, an interlock first portion, and an auto-disarm second portion. The shaft is rotatable about the second rotational axis between an armed position and a disarmed position. The shaft includes an interlock cam and an auto-disarming cam. In a first interlock position, the interlock first portion permits rotation of the shaft between the armed position and the disarmed position. In a second interlock position, the interlock first portion prevents rotation of the shaft from the disarmed position to the armed position. In a first auto-disarm position, the auto-disarm second portion permits rotation of the shaft between the armed position and the disarmed position. In a second auto-disarm position, the auto-disarm second portion prevents rotation of the shaft from the disarmed position to the armed position.