Automotive Door Catcher Pin Side Impact Locking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing solutions for limiting door intrusion during a side impact in automotive vehicles do not effectively control the recession of the door's bottom part or provide a locking mechanism for the stopper pin, leading to uncontrolled kinetic energy transfer.

Innovation Solution

A door system with an impact-responsive catcher pin that extends from the door into a receiver on the rocker beam, driven by a supplemental restraint system, featuring a stored energy device and an integral sprag for positive locking, coordinated with side airbag deployment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If a very rigid door is used to limit intrusion during heavy impact, then door intrusion is reduced, but more kinetic energy is transferred to the vehicle

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor intrusionVSAvoidkinetic energy transfer
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The door system transitions from a static rigid structure to a dynamic system with controlled movement. The catcher pin mechanism allows the door to move dynamically during impact, absorbing energy through controlled deformation and movement rather than rigid resistance, thereby reducing kinetic energy transfer to the vehicle while still limiting intrusion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The catcher pin is pre-positioned and spring-loaded within the door assembly before impact occurs. Upon impact detection, the mechanism automatically engages the catcher pin with the receiver on the rocker beam, providing immediate intrusion limitation without requiring active control during the impact event.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Object-affected harmful factors

If a pyrotechnically driven component is extended into the B pillar to limit door intrusion, then intrusion is limited, but the system does not control recession of the bottom part of the door

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor intrusionVSAvoidcontrol of door recession
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The door restraint system is divided into multiple independent components: the catcher pin for lateral intrusion control, the spring mechanism for recession control, and the receiver on the rocker beam for anchoring. This segmentation allows each component to address specific aspects of door movement independently, providing comprehensive control over both intrusion and recession.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The catcher pin acts as an intermediary element between the door and the rocker beam. It transfers and controls forces during impact, mediating the interaction between the door structure and the vehicle frame, thereby enabling controlled limitation of both intrusion and recession through its engagement with the receiver.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If a stopper pin is extended into the B pillar to limit door intrusion, then intrusion is limited, but the system does not provide a locking mechanism

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor intrusionVSAvoidlocking engagement
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The spring-loaded catcher pin mechanism is pre-positioned and cushioned within the door assembly before impact. The spring provides a cushioning effect that allows controlled engagement of the catcher pin with the receiver, ensuring reliable locking while accommodating variations in impact force and timing without causing structural damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The catcher pin mechanism utilizes changes in spring compression and pin position parameters to achieve reliable locking. The spring constant, pin geometry, and receiver dimensions are optimized to ensure consistent engagement under varying impact conditions, transforming the locking mechanism's parameters to maintain reliability across different impact scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Mitigates door intrusion and kinetic energy transfer during side impacts by deploying the catcher pin to resist translational movement, ensuring the pin remains locked and only the affected doors are secured, with low installed weight and integration with current vehicle designs.

Implementation Method 1

A catcher pin according to the present invention is driven by a stored energy device which may include a pyrotechnic charge, or a compressed gas canister, or compression spring, or other types of stored energy linear actuators known to those skilled in the art

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectStored energy: Accumulator (energy)

Implementation Method 2

The catcher pin is driven by a stored energy device which may include a pyrotechnic charge

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPyrotechnic charge: Pyrolysis

Data Source

PatentUS7311169B1Door system for automotive vehicle
Publication Date: 2007.12.25 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US7311169B1 patent drawing
  • US7311169B1 patent drawing
  • US7311169B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A door system for an automotive vehicle includes an impact-responsive catcher pin which may be operated by a supplemental restraint system having side impact sensing capability so that the impact-responsive catcher pin may be directed to deploy from a housing mounted within a vehicle door, to a position in which the catcher pin locks the vehicle door to a rocker beam adjoining the door.