Door Closer Using Flexible Element and Braking Device

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional door closers are complex, unreliable, difficult to install, and often use oil, which raises concerns about fire safety, sustainability, and require complicated adjustments.

Innovation Solution

A flexible elongated element-based arrangement with a braking device that allows for tensioning to control door movement, eliminating the need for hydraulic systems and enabling easy installation and compact design, with optional electromagnetic generators for energy harvesting and smart control systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional door closers use hydraulic cylinders containing oil, then damping force can be provided proportional to door speed, but fire safety is compromised and leakage occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamping force reliabilityVSAvoidfire safety and leakage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the hydraulic mechanical system with an electromagnetic system. The door closer uses an electromagnetic motor to provide controlled closing force and a separate electromagnetic braking device to control door speed, eliminating the need for oil-based hydraulic cylinders and associated fire safety and leakage problems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and removes the harmful hydraulic oil system from the door closer design. By separating the damping function into a distinct electromagnetic braking device, the design eliminates the oil containment issues while maintaining the speed control function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Ease of operation

If conventional door closers use complex cam profiles to control closing force, then closing force control is achieved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclosing force controlVSAvoidmechanical design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mechanical cam profiles with electromagnetic control systems. The closing force is controlled through an electromagnetic motor that can be programmed to deliver precise force profiles, and the braking device provides electronic speed control, eliminating the need for complex mechanical cam mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic control through electromagnetic systems that can adjust closing force and speed in real-time based on programmed parameters, replacing static mechanical cam profiles with adaptable electronic control that simplifies the mechanical structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If conventional door closers are designed with complicated adjustments, then precise control is achieved, but ease of installation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidinstallation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates self-adjusting electromagnetic control systems that automatically calibrate and optimize door closing parameters during initial operation. The electronic control system can self-diagnose and adjust parameters without requiring complex manual adjustments, making installation simpler while maintaining precise control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses feedback mechanisms where sensors monitor door position, speed, and force, and the electronic control system continuously adjusts parameters to achieve optimal performance. This automated feedback loop eliminates the need for complex manual adjustment procedures during installation while maintaining high precision control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Adaptability or versatility

If conventional door closers use temperature-sensitive materials, then environmental adaptation is achieved, but reliability deteriorates due to temperature changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental adaptationVSAvoidtemperature stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces temperature-sensitive mechanical components with electromagnetic systems that are less sensitive to temperature variations. The electromagnetic motor and braking device maintain consistent performance across a wider temperature range, and the electronic control system can compensate for environmental conditions through software algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a reliable, cost-effective, and compact door closer system that is easy to install and operate, eliminating the drawbacks of conventional door closers by using a flexible elongated element and braking device, and enabling efficient energy harvesting and smart control.

Implementation Method 1

a flexible elongated element configured to be tensioned to thereby force the base section and the fixation part to move towards each other in a relative closing movement

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

a braking device arranged to brake a speed of the relative closing movement

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS12188290B2Arrangement for controlling movements of access member, access member, frame, access member system and method
Publication Date: 2025.01.07 ASSA ABLOY AB
  • US12188290B2 patent drawing
  • US12188290B2 patent drawing
  • US12188290B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An arrangement (16) for controlling movements of an access member (12) relative to a frame (14), the arrangement (16) comprising abase section (18) for connection to either the access member (12) or the frame (14); a fixation part (20) for connection to the other of the access member (12) and the frame (14); a flexible elongated element (22) configured to be tensioned to thereby force the base section (18) and the fixation part (20) to move towards each other in a relative closing movement (86); and a braking device (82) arranged to brake a speed of the relative closing movement (86).