Vehicle Door Collision Avoidance via Haptic Feedback and Stop

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In crowded environments, the risk of collisions between a vehicle and external objects increases when its door is being opened, as existing systems fail to effectively prevent or mitigate these collisions.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle equipped with a rotatable door featuring a door stop assembly and haptic feedback assembly, controlled by processors that compute time-to-collision and activate the assemblies to arrest door opening and provide vibrations through the handle, thereby preventing collisions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a door stop assembly is activated to arrest door opening, then collision risk is reduced, but the door opening operation is interrupted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision avoidanceVSAvoiddoor opening
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The door stop assembly is activated before the door can complete its opening motion when a collision risk is detected. The system preemptively applies the door stop mechanism to prevent the harmful collision before it occurs, sacrificing the door opening operation to ensure safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The haptic feedback assembly provides early warning to the user before the door stop is fully engaged. This preliminary action alerts the user to the collision risk and the impending door stop activation, allowing the user to react before the door opening is arrested.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If haptic feedback assembly vibrates the handle, then user awareness is increased, but additional energy consumption occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser awarenessVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The haptic feedback assembly activates in periodic pulses rather than continuous operation. The vibration is triggered specifically when collision risk is detected and deactivated when the risk passes, providing user awareness only when necessary and minimizing energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Reliability

If door stop and haptic feedback assemblies are simultaneously activated, then collision prevention is enhanced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision preventionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The door stop assembly and haptic feedback assembly are integrated into a unified door safety system controlled by a single processor. The processor monitors collision risk and simultaneously controls both the door stop activation and haptic feedback, merging two functions into one coordinated system rather than separate independent systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The processor serves multiple functions: it monitors the door opening state, detects collision risk, controls the door stop assembly, and activates the haptic feedback assembly. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated controllers for each component, simplifying the overall system architecture despite the multiple functions being performed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively reduces the risk of collisions by arresting door opening and alerting the user through haptic feedback, ensuring safer operation in crowded conditions.

Implementation Method 1

a haptic feedback assembly arranged to vibrate the handle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration: Vibration

Data Source

PatentUS10183640B2Systems and methods for door collision avoidance
Publication Date: 2019.01.22 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US10183640B2 patent drawing
  • US10183640B2 patent drawing
  • US10183640B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle includes: (a) a rotatable door including: a door stop assembly configured to arrest opening of the door; a rotatable handle; a haptic feedback assembly arranged to vibrate the handle; (b) processor(s) configured to simultaneously activate the door stop and haptic feedback assemblies. The haptic feedback assembly is disposed within the rotatable handle. The processor(s) are configured to: compute a time-to-collision, and run the haptic feedback assembly at a level based on the time-to-collision.