Door System Electronic Control Device Integration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing motorized door systems struggle to integrate complex functional processes and decisions, making them expensive and inefficient in advanced applications.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating an additional electronic control device connected to the drive controller via a bus system, enabling increased electronic intelligence and the ability to perform complex decisions and functional processes, with features like processors, memory, and hardware accelerators for AI, allowing for advanced motor control and integration with sensors and access attributes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If an additional electronic control device is integrated into the door system, then the system's electronic intelligence and ability to perform complex decisions are improved, but the device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectronic intelligenceVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control functionality is segmented into two distinct components: the existing drive controller that handles basic motor control, and the new electronic control device that handles complex decision-making and functional processes. This segmentation allows each component to specialize in specific tasks, improving overall system intelligence without requiring a complete redesign of the entire control system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The electronic control device acts as an intermediary between the drive controller and other door components (sensors, access control systems, etc.). It receives signals from various components, processes them using advanced logic and AI capabilities, and sends appropriate commands to the drive controller, thereby enabling complex functional processes while maintaining a modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the door system integrates complex functional processes and decisions, then the system capability is improved, but the implementation cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem capabilityVSAvoidimplementation cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The electronic control device is designed as a universal controller that can handle multiple functions including access control, safety monitoring, complex decision-making, and coordination of various door components. By using a single multi-functional device rather than multiple specialized components, the system achieves high adaptability while controlling implementation costs through component consolidation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The electronic control device incorporates adjustable parameters and configurable settings that allow the system to adapt to different application requirements without hardware changes. This flexibility enables the same device to serve diverse functions across different door systems, reducing overall implementation costs while maintaining high system capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240125166A1Door system for one or more doors
Publication Date: 2024.04.18 DORMAKABA DEUT GMBH
  • US20240125166A1 patent drawing
  • US20240125166A1 patent drawing
  • US20240125166A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A door system for one or more doors, wherein the door system includes at least one motor door drive, and the door drive includes a motor and a drive controller for actuating the motor of the door drive. The door system includes a controller which is connected to the drive controller.