Door Fault Identification via Sensor Data Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Diagnosing the root cause of improper door operation is challenging due to similar symptoms from various faults, which can lead to delayed recognition and potential damage or safety issues, requiring experienced technicians to make multiple trips for troubleshooting and repair.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a door fault identification system that collects and analyzes sensor data from various sensors, including accelerometers, gyrometers, and environmental sensors, to determine behavior data indicative of door faults, comparing it to representative data to determine the likelihood of specific faults and providing recommended maintenance operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If multiple sensors are deployed to collect comprehensive door behavior data, then fault detection accuracy is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault detection accuracyVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The door monitoring system is segmented into multiple independent sensor units (accelerometer, gyrometer, magnetometer, environmental sensors) that can be deployed selectively. Each sensor targets specific fault indicators, allowing the system to achieve comprehensive monitoring capability while maintaining modularity and reducing overall system complexity through functional decomposition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Loss of information

If comprehensive sensor data collection is implemented, then fault identification capability is improved, but data processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault information completenessVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and isolates specific behavior parameters from the comprehensive sensor data that are most indicative of door faults. By focusing on key extracted features rather than processing all raw sensor data, the system achieves complete fault information while reducing data processing complexity through selective feature extraction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

A data processing intermediary layer is introduced that sits between the multiple sensors and the fault analysis system. This intermediary performs data fusion, filtering, and feature extraction, transforming complex multi-sensor data into simplified behavior parameters that are easier to analyze while preserving all essential fault information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If representative fault data is compared against sensor data to determine fault likelihood, then diagnostic accuracy is improved, but analysis time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic accuracyVSAvoidfault analysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Representive fault data patterns are pre-established and stored in the system before actual fault diagnosis is needed. By preparing reference fault profiles in advance, the system can quickly compare current sensor readings against known fault patterns, achieving high diagnostic accuracy while minimizing real-time analysis time through pre-computed reference data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20230258611A1Door fault identification
Publication Date: 2023.08.17 SCHLAGE LOCK CO LLC
  • US20230258611A1 patent drawing
  • US20230258611A1 patent drawing
  • US20230258611A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method according to one embodiment includes receiving sensor data from a plurality of sensors of a door device associated with a door, analyzing the sensor data to determine behavior data indicative of a behavior of the door device, and comparing the behavior data to a plurality of representative data associated with a plurality of door faults to determine a corresponding likelihood that the sensor data corresponds with each of the door faults.