Intelligent Door Knob Mechanical Energy Transmission Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional door lock systems, particularly those with deadbolts, are susceptible to unauthorized access due to manual operation requirements and lack of electronic control redundancy, leading to potential unauthorized entry and theft, especially in settings like motel and hotel rooms where key-actuated deadbolts are not standard.

Innovation Solution

An intelligent door knob system that integrates a mechanism to control the transmission of displacement or rotational mechanical energy, coupled with an energy source and wireless communication, allowing manual operation and authorization through a mobile device, enabling secure and independent electronic and manual lock operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual operation of deadbolt is required for effective locking, then security against unauthorized access is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates and risk of forgetting to lock increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The door closing mechanism automatically actuates the deadbolt to the locked position without requiring manual intervention. The system serves itself by using the door's closing motion to trigger the locking action, eliminating the need for users to remember to manually lock the deadbolt while maintaining security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The deadbolt is automatically extended to the locked position as the door closes, performing the locking action in advance before the user needs to enter or exit. This preliminary automatic locking ensures security is established before any potential unauthorized access attempt.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Device complexity

If manual actuation of deadbolt is required, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability deteriorates due to human error in actuation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically performs the deadbolt actuation function using the door's closing motion as the trigger, making the system self-sufficient and eliminating dependence on human memory or action. This maintains mechanical simplicity while dramatically improving reliability by removing the human error factor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If electronic control system is added for automatic deadbolt actuation, then ease of operation is improved and reliability against human error increases, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex electronic control systems with a purely mechanical actuation mechanism. The door closing motion mechanically triggers the deadbolt extension through linkages and cam mechanisms, achieving automatic operation without electronics, thereby improving ease of operation while minimizing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Ease of operation

If latch mechanism alone is used for door locking, then ease of operation is maintained, but security deteriorates due to susceptibility to unauthorized depression-release

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidsecurity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges the latch mechanism with an independently actuated deadbolt mechanism. The latch provides ease of operation for frequent door openings, while the deadbolt provides enhanced security against forced entry and unauthorized manipulation. Both mechanisms work together to satisfy opposing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The locking system is segmented into two independent functions: the latch for frequent operation and the deadbolt for security. Each mechanism can be actuated independently, allowing the latch to remain easily operable while the deadbolt provides robust security that cannot be easily compromised by card-type elements or pry bars.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS9725927B1System for intelligent door knob (handle)
Publication Date: 2017.08.08 MASTER LOCK CO INC
  • US9725927B1 patent drawing
  • US9725927B1 patent drawing
  • US9725927B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A door lock system includes a knob and an apparatus that controls transmission of displacement or rotational mechanical energy. A bolt is coupled to a door, an input rod and an output rod. At least one of an interior or exterior knob is coupled to the bolt and the apparatus that controls transmission of displacement or rotational mechanical energy. An energy source is coupled to the apparatus that controls transmission of displacement or rotational mechanical energy. The mobile device provides authorization to engage the apparatus that controls transmission of displacement or rotational mechanical energy and allows a door user to manually open the door.