Powered Door Lock Alarm Modes for Adaptive Theft Deterrence

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current vehicle alarm systems lack the ability to operate in multiple modes based on the level of theft activity detected and are limited in controlling a wide variety of vehicle components to effectively deter theft.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle system equipped with powered door locks, sensors, and an electronic control unit that moves the door locks in a predetermined pattern based on speed in response to unauthorized events, allowing for differentiated alarm actions between first and second levels of theft activity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a vehicle alarm system operates only in a limited manner with restricted components, then the system complexity is reduced, but the effectiveness of theft deterrence is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetheft deterrence effectivenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The alarm system dynamically transitions between multiple operational modes (first mode for first level theft activity, second mode for second level theft activity) based on detected threat levels. This allows the system to adapt its complexity and response intensity to match the actual security situation, improving deterrence effectiveness without requiring maximum complexity to be always active.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The alarm system is segmented into multiple independent operational modes with distinct alarm routines. Each mode can be independently activated based on the level of theft activity detected, allowing the system to provide differentiated responses (e.g., different alarm actions, different component engagements) for different threat levels, thereby enhancing overall effectiveness while managing complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If a vehicle alarm system operates in multiple modes with differentiated alarm actions, then the theft deterrence effectiveness is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetheft deterrence effectivenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs dynamic mode switching capability that automatically transitions between first and second operational modes based on the level of theft activity detected by sensors. This dynamic adaptation allows the alarm system to provide appropriately differentiated responses without requiring manual intervention or complex configuration, thereby improving deterrence effectiveness while managing operational complexity through automated logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The alarm system incorporates feedback mechanisms where sensors continuously monitor theft activity levels and provide input to the control unit. Based on this feedback, the system automatically adjusts its operational mode and alarm routine selection, enabling differentiated responses to different threat levels. This feedback-driven approach improves effectiveness by matching response intensity to actual threat level while keeping the control architecture manageable through rule-based decision logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If the powered door locks move repeatedly in a predetermined pattern based on speed, then the alarm response becomes more dynamic and deterrent, but the energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealarm response effectivenessVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The powered door locks execute periodic movement patterns at varying speeds as part of the alarm routine, creating a dynamic and unpredictable deterrent effect. The periodic nature of these movements, combined with variable speed patterns, enhances alarm effectiveness by making the system's behavior less predictable to potential thieves while allowing energy consumption to be managed through controlled duty cycles and speed variations rather than continuous high-power operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances theft deterrence by providing a dynamic and multi-faceted alarm response that can adapt to varying levels of threat, effectively utilizing a range of vehicle components to alert and deter potential thieves.

Implementation Method 1

a motor for positioning the powered door locks between a locked position and an unlocked position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic conversion: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

a sensor configured to capture data of activity around the vehicle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSensor detection:

Data Source

PatentUS11794691B2Vehicles and vehicle systems for operating powered door locks in an alarm deterrent mode
Publication Date: 2023.10.24 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US11794691B2 patent drawing
  • US11794691B2 patent drawing
  • US11794691B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle including powered door locks, a motor for positioning the powered door locks between a locked position and an unlocked position, one or more sensors for detecting an unauthorized event around the vehicle, and a controller configured to operate the motor to repeatedly move the powered door locks in a predetermined pattern based on speed in response to the one or more sensors detecting an unauthorized event around the vehicle.