Vehicle Door Lock Opening With Power-Failure Blocking Lever

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing motor vehicle opening devices fail to ensure safe and complete opening of vehicle parts in the event of a power failure or current drop, particularly when vehicles are equipped without external door handles or mechanical connections.

Innovation Solution

A motor vehicle lock with a rotary latch, pawl, and electric drive device, equipped with a safety means that holds the vehicle part in an open position during power failure, using a spring-loaded blocking lever that engages with the lock strike to prevent complete opening.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If an electric drive device is used to unlock the motor vehicle lock, then the ease of operation is improved, but the reliability deteriorates in the event of power failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The safety means is pre-positioned to automatically engage when power fails, before complete loss of control occurs. The blocking lever is designed to spring into the blocking position automatically upon power loss, preventing uncontrolled door opening before the situation can deteriorate further

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The safety means acts as an intermediary mechanism between the electric drive device and the door opening function. It provides a mechanical safety layer that mediates the transition from electrically-controlled opening to a controlled mechanical blocking state, ensuring reliable operation even when electrical systems fail

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If the vehicle part can be fully opened for easy exit, then the ease of operation is improved, but the safety deteriorates due to risk of accidental complete opening

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidsafety
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The door opening function is segmented into two distinct phases: a first opening phase that allows controlled opening to a predetermined position, and a second phase that would lead to complete opening. The safety means blocks the second phase, ensuring that even if the electric drive fails, the door can only open partially rather than fully, thus segmenting the risk

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The safety means allows partial opening action (first opening phase) to occur for normal operation, but prevents excessive action (complete opening) by mechanically blocking further movement. This enables the door to open sufficiently for normal access while preventing dangerous complete opening in case of failure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If a safety means is added to prevent complete opening, then the safety is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The safety means is merged with the existing locking mechanism structure. The blocking lever integrates with the lock housing and utilizes the existing lock strike, combining the safety function with the primary locking system rather than adding a completely separate mechanism. This reduces overall complexity compared to independent safety systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The blocking lever serves multiple functions: it acts as a safety block to prevent complete door opening, and it can also serve as a mechanical backup for the electric drive device. The spring mechanism provides both the blocking force and the reset function, making the safety means multi-functional rather than a single-purpose addition

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Ensures safe and secure holding of vehicle parts in an open position during emergencies, allowing occupants to exit safely while preventing accidental full opening, even without mechanical connections or external handles.

Implementation Method 1

a spring element arranged in the motor vehicle lock which acts on the blocking lever in a spring-loaded manner

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Data Source

PatentUS12559994B2Opening apparatus for a motor vehicle door element
Publication Date: 2026.02.24 KIEKERT AG
  • US12559994B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A motor vehicle lock having a locking mechanism with a rotary latch and at least one pawl, wherein a rotary movement of the rotary latch can be locked by means of the pawl, an electric drive device with which the pawl can be transferred from a locking position into a release position for the locking mechanism, and an opening device, wherein a vehicle part interacting with the motor vehicle lock can be moved by means of the opening device from a closed position into an open position, and wherein a safety means is provided, wherein the safety means makes it possible to hold the vehicle part in the event of a power failure.