Motor Vehicle Door Lock Catch Lever Inertia Blocking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing motor vehicle door lock systems face reliability issues due to unintentional opening during crashes, caused by inertia forces, which can be exacerbated by corrosion or aging, leading to incorrect functioning and safety hazards.

Innovation Solution

A catch lever is designed to be permanently active, balancing its center of gravity at the pivot point, ensuring it remains in a blocking position both during normal operation and crashes, with an elastic coupling using a spring to release the locking mechanism only during normal opening, preventing unwanted opening.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a catch lever is designed to block the locking mechanism only during crashes (inertia lock), then the design remains simple, but functional reliability decreases due to corrosion or aging blocking movement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign simplicityVSAvoidfunctional reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the traditional inertia lock concept by making the catch lever permanently active in blocking mode during normal operation, rather than only during crashes. The catch lever is spring-loaded to maintain constant blocking pressure on the locking mechanism, ensuring reliability. During normal door opening, the release lever overcomes this spring force to disengage the catch. During crashes, the inertia forces add to the spring force, maintaining blocking without requiring movement of the catch lever itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The catch lever design allows the system to self-check functionality during every normal door opening operation. The movement required to open the door automatically verifies that the catch lever is properly positioned and functional, eliminating the need for separate maintenance checks. The spring-loaded mechanism automatically maintains blocking pressure without requiring external actuation or monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If the catch lever is permanently active in blocking position, then reliability increases, but the mechanism becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional reliabilityVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the crash-blocking function with the normal door opening mechanism. The catch lever's spring-loaded blocking action during normal operation uses the same structural components and movement paths as the crash-blocking function. The release lever serves dual purposes: it opens the door normally by disengaging the catch lever, and it would also function during crashes if needed. This integration eliminates the need for separate blocking mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The spring-loaded catch lever uses elastic counterforce to balance the blocking requirement. The spring provides continuous blocking pressure that can be overcome by the release lever during normal operation but would be augmented by inertia forces during crashes. This elastic counterweight mechanism simplifies the overall structure compared to purely mechanical blocking systems while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the catch lever moves during crashes to block the locking mechanism, then blocking is achieved, but corrosion or aging can block the movement causing incorrect functioning

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrash blockingVSAvoidcorrect functioning
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The catch lever is pre-positioned in the blocking orientation through spring loading during normal operation, rather than requiring movement during crashes to achieve blocking. The lever is already in the correct position to block the locking mechanism, and crash forces simply augment the existing spring force to ensure blocking is maintained. This preliminary positioning eliminates the reliability issue of requiring movement during crashes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the movement requirement from the crash-blocking function. Instead of the catch lever needing to move during crashes to achieve blocking, the lever is spring-loaded to maintain constant blocking pressure. The only movement required is during normal door opening operations, which are frequent and verify functionality. This separates the blocking function from movement, eliminating corrosion-related reliability issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Stability of the object's composition

If the catch lever is balanced at the pivot point, then it remains stable in blocking position, but the lever cannot be actuated by inertia forces during crashes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblocking position stabilityVSAvoidinertia force response
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The spring-loaded catch lever uses elastic counterforce to balance the lever in the blocking position. The spring provides continuous force that maintains the lever against the locking mechanism, creating a stable blocking position without requiring the lever to be perfectly balanced at the pivot point. During crashes, inertia forces add to the spring force, ensuring blocking is maintained rather than requiring the lever to be actuated by inertia alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from a static balanced lever to a dynamic spring-loaded lever. The spring provides continuous adaptive force that maintains blocking pressure regardless of lever position or inertia forces. During normal operation, the spring force can be overcome by the release lever. During crashes, the spring force is augmented by inertia forces, dynamically adjusting the blocking pressure to maintain reliability without requiring perfect balance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enhances functional reliability by maintaining the catch lever's blocking position during crashes, preventing unintended door opening, while ensuring correct functionality through synchronized movement with the release lever during normal operation, thus avoiding faults from corrosion or aging.

Implementation Method 1

an elastic coupling using a spring to release the locking mechanism only during normal opening

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic coupling: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

blocking the locking mechanism at least when acceleration forces of a given magnitude occur, e.g. in case of an accident (crash)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInertia forces: Inertia

Data Source

PatentUS9243429B2Motor vehicle door lock
Publication Date: 2016.01.26 KIEKERT AG
  • US9243429B2 patent drawing
  • US9243429B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a motor vehicle door lock equipped with a locking mechanism (1, 2, 3), an actuation lever unit that acts on the locking mechanism (1, 2, 3) and includes a release lever (4), and a catch lever (10). The catch lever (10) blocks the locking mechanism (1, 2, 3) at least when acceleration forces of a given magnitude occur, e.g. in case of an accident (crash). According to the invention, the catch lever (10) blocks the locking mechanism (1, 2, 3) in the event of a crash while releasing the locking mechanism (1, 2, 3) only for normal opening operation.