Vehicle Door Lock Gesture Control With Event-Based Sensing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle door lock systems require user proximity for operation, leading to security vulnerabilities and high computational complexity, especially with camera-based solutions.

Innovation Solution

An event-based sensor integrated into the vehicle door handle detects hand gestures for remote lock control, utilizing near-infrared sensitivity and low-data processing, combined with a time-of-flight sensor for collision detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If camera-based facial recognition is used for user identification, then user recognition capability is improved, but computational complexity and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser recognition capabilityVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex camera-based facial recognition systems with a simpler gesture recognition system using sensors to detect hand movements and positions. This substitution reduces computational complexity while maintaining user identification and authentication capabilities through alternative biometric data (hand geometry and gesture patterns).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs lower-cost sensor components instead of expensive camera systems with complex image processing algorithms. By using simpler sensing technology that detects hand gestures and positions, the system achieves user recognition functionality at reduced computational and financial cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Adaptability or versatility

If standard cameras are used for facial recognition, then user identification is achieved, but data processing requirements and system cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser identificationVSAvoiddata processing requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential information needed for user identification by detecting specific hand gesture patterns and positions, rather than processing complete facial images. This selective extraction of relevant data reduces the quantity of data that needs to be processed while maintaining accurate user identification capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces data-intensive camera-based image processing with simpler sensor-based gesture detection. The sensors capture minimal data points representing hand positions and movements, which require significantly less computational resources to process compared to full facial recognition data streams.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If contactless sensors with wide detection range are used, then ease of operation is improved, but security vulnerabilities increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection rangeVSAvoidsecurity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements localized gesture recognition that requires specific hand movements within defined spatial zones near the vehicle. By requiring precise local gestures (such as specific hand positions or motion patterns) rather than general proximity detection, the system maintains ease of operation for authorized users while preventing unauthorized access from a distance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of detecting what users should do (authorized gestures), the system is designed to detect and reject unauthorized actions. The gesture recognition algorithm is configured to identify legitimate user patterns and automatically reject any deviations, inverting the traditional approach of accepting inputs and then validating them.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables remote and secure lock control with reduced data processing demands and enhanced safety by detecting hand gestures and obstacles, allowing operation from a distance and preventing collisions.

Implementation Method 1

the event-based sensor is sensitive to light in the near infrared wavelength band

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNear infrared sensitivity: Infrared Radiation

Implementation Method 2

processing, by the processing unit, the pixel data from the time-of-flight sensor and from the event-based sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTime of flight: Time of Flight

Data Source

PatentEP4667298A1Method and device for controlling a door lock device of a motor vehicle
Publication Date: 2025.12.24 MINEBEA ACCESSSOLUTIONS ITALIA SPA
  • EP4667298A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4667298A1 patent drawingFigure 3~5
  • EP4667298A1 patent drawingFigure 6~8

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a method for controlling a lock mechanism of a motor vehicle door (1), the method comprising: acquiring, by a processing unit of the motor vehicle, pixel data from an event-based sensor (3) embedded in the vehicle; processing, by the processing unit, the pixel data to identify a hand of a user in the pixel data; detecting, by the processing unit, a hand gesture of the hand identified in the pixel data; and controlling the lock mechanism, by the processing unit, as a function of the detected hand gesture.