Vehicle Door Lock Interface Device Bypassing Sliding Window

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing solutions for mechanically coupling locks and remote locks in vehicles with sliding windows, especially when the lock is offset and the rear edge of the window is close to the rear wall, face issues such as significant deflections, noise generation, and inefficiency due to the use of rods, gimbals, or gears, which limit their effectiveness and suitability.

Innovation Solution

A device comprising a first wheel coupled to the lock, a second wheel with a cable, a first transfer pinion, and a shaft that extends around the window, allowing for actuation of the lock with minimal deformation and noise, and enabling the lock to be offset without obstructing the sliding window, even when it is close to the rear wall.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a rigid rod is used to couple the lock and remote lock, then the mechanical coupling is strong, but the device requires large volume and causes significant deflections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical coupling strengthVSAvoidvolume between rear edge of sliding window and rear wall of door box
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The rigid rod is segmented into multiple rod subparts connected by articulation joints, allowing the mechanism to achieve the necessary coupling strength while reducing the overall volume requirement and enabling adaptation to tight spaces between the window and door box

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The rigid rod is transformed into a dynamic articulated mechanism that can adapt its configuration based on the available space and window position, maintaining mechanical coupling strength while accommodating variable volume constraints

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Strength

If a rigid rod is used to couple the lock and remote lock, then the mechanical coupling is strong, but the rod deformation increases locking/unlocking stroke length

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical coupling strengthVSAvoidlocking/unlocking operation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the rod into rigid subparts connected by articulation joints, the mechanism maintains high mechanical coupling strength in each segment while the articulated connections accommodate movements without excessive deformation, preserving locking/unlocking stroke length and operational efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Strength

If a rigid rod is used to couple the lock and remote lock, then the mechanical coupling is strong, but vibrations generate unpleasant noises

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical coupling strengthVSAvoidvibration-induced noise
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Segmenting the rod into rigid subparts with articulation joints creates multiple connection points that can independently absorb and dampen vibrations, reducing the transmission of vibrational noise while maintaining overall mechanical coupling strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The articulated mechanism provides dynamic adaptation to vibrations, allowing the joints to flex and absorb vibrational energy rather than transmitting it rigidly, thereby reducing noise generation while preserving coupling strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Reliability

If a gimbal is used to couple the lock and remote lock, then picking resistance is improved, but the device obstructs the sliding window when the rear edge is close to the rear wall

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepicking resistanceVSAvoidspace occupied by the coupling device
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The gimbal is segmented into multiple smaller articulation joints distributed along the rod subparts, maintaining the picking resistance benefits of the gimbal mechanism while reducing the overall volume and allowing operation in tighter spaces near the window

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The articulated mechanism provides dynamic adaptability, allowing the coupling device to conform to the available space and window position, reducing obstruction while maintaining the security benefits of gimbal-based picking resistance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

5Shape

If multiple pinions are used to increase vertical offset, then the offset capability is improved, but the efficiency decreases and it cannot handle significant transverse offset

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevertical offset capabilityVSAvoidlocking mechanism efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The mechanism transitions from relying solely on multiple pinions for offset to using an articulated rod structure that can accommodate offset in multiple dimensions (vertical, horizontal, and transverse) simultaneously, maintaining efficiency while providing comprehensive offset capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution allows for reliable and quiet operation with minimal deformation, enabling effective locking/unlocking without obstructing the sliding window, even in tight spaces, and maintains efficiency by using a bypass mechanism that adapts to various window positions.

Implementation Method 1

a first wheel (R1) able to be coupled in rotation to the lock and to which is coupled at least one cable (CBi)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

a first transfer pinion (PT1) coupled in rotation to the second wheel (R2), and a shaft (AR) intended to circumvent the window (VT)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGear: Gear

Data Source

PatentEP2828453B1Interface device forming the interface between a vehicle door lock and bolt having wheels, cable(s) and bypassing shaft
Publication Date: 2017.09.20 VALEO SECURITE HABITACLE
  • EP2828453B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2828453B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP2828453B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

A device (D) acts as an interface between a bolt (VR) and a lock (SR) which is offset transversely in a vehicle door (PV) comprising a box section (CP) in which a window (VT) can slide. This device (D) comprises a first wheel (R1), coupled in rotation to the bolt (VR) and to which a cable (CB1) is coupled, a second wheel (R2) to which the cable (CB1) is coupled, a first transfer pinion (PT1) rotationally coupled to the second wheel (R2) and a shaft (AR) that bypasses the window (VT) whatever its position in the box section (CP), and comprises a first end equipped with a second transfer pinion (PT2) meshing with the first transfer pinion (PT1) and a second end coupled to the lock (SR) so as to operate the latter when it is turned.