Door Lock Sensor with Accelerometer for Forced Entry Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electronic door lock systems face challenges in accurately distinguishing between normal door closures and attempted forced entries, often resulting in false alarms and inadequate security measures.

Innovation Solution

A door lock and sensor combination utilizing a multi-axis accelerometer to measure acceleration in multiple directions, with a controller analyzing these signals to differentiate between normal closures and forced entries, and communicating security information to a remote station via a communication link.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a simple door lock system is used, then the device complexity is low, but the measurement precision of door movement detection is insufficient leading to false alarms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor movement detection accuracyVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The door lock system is segmented into distinct functional modules: a simple single-axis accelerometer for basic motion detection, a separate controller for signal analysis, and a communication module for alerts. This segmentation allows the sensor itself to remain simple while achieving high detection precision through sophisticated signal processing in the controller.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The controller acts as an intermediary between the simple accelerometer sensor and the alarm system. It processes the raw acceleration signals, distinguishes between normal door closures and forced entries based on signal patterns, and only triggers alarms when forced entry is detected. This intermediary processing resolves the contradiction by adding intelligence without complicating the sensor hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If a multi-axis accelerometer is used to improve detection accuracy, then the measurement precision improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforced entry detection accuracyVSAvoidaccelerometer system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses a single-axis accelerometer (partial action) rather than a full multi-axis accelerometer (excessive action). The single axis is oriented to detect the specific direction of forced entry attempts, providing sufficient detection precision without the added complexity of multiple axes. This partial measurement approach resolves the contradiction by using only the necessary sensing capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of measurement precision not by increasing sensor complexity (multi-axis accelerometer) but by optimizing the signal processing parameters in the controller. The controller analyzes acceleration patterns, thresholds, and temporal characteristics to achieve high detection accuracy with a simpler single-axis sensor, thereby resolving the contradiction through parameter optimization rather than hardware escalation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If alarm functionality is added to the door lock, then the security capability is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity function reliabilityVSAvoidsystem integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The alarm functionality is merged with the existing door lock controller rather than being implemented as a separate alarm system. The same controller that processes accelerometer data and determines forced entry also triggers the alarm function, consolidating multiple security functions into a single integrated unit. This merging reduces overall system complexity while maintaining reliable security functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The door lock controller is designed with multi-functionality, serving both as the primary lock control unit and as the alarm system controller. It universally handles multiple tasks: monitoring door status, processing authentication, analyzing accelerometer signals, and triggering alarms. This universal design eliminates the need for separate dedicated alarm hardware, reducing complexity while improving security reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively reduces false alarms by accurately identifying attempted forced entries and provides enhanced security through precise monitoring of door movements and status, enabling timely alerts and improved security protocols.

Implementation Method 1

A door lock and sensor combination includes an accelerometer, a housing, and a circuit board positioned in the housing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcceleration measurement: Accelerometer

Data Source

PatentUS11282311B2Door lock sensor and alarm
Publication Date: 2022.03.22 SCHLAGE LOCK CO LLC
  • US11282311B2 patent drawing
  • US11282311B2 patent drawing
  • US11282311B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A door lock mechanism is disclosed that includes door lock and alarm features. The mechanism includes a controller and a sensor useful to detect motions that are representative of attempted access through a door to which the door lock mechanism is attached. The controller can set an alarm condition if a measured motion, such as a measured acceleration, meet and/or exceeds a threshold. If an appropriate access control credential is provided through a user device then the alarm condition may not be set by the controller. The door lock mechanism can be coupled to a remote station via a communications link if needed, such as a radio frequency link. The remote station can additionally be in communication with the door lock mechanism via a network. The remote station can be used to send and receive messages regarding door lock mechanism status, configuration, etc.