Door Motor Speed Feedback and Braking for Simpler Automation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing automated door control systems require complex control systems and electronics, and significant customization to accommodate different motor models, making them inefficient and difficult to implement.

Innovation Solution

A door control system that includes a controller receiving a target speed and current speed from an encoder, adjusting a control signal based on these speeds, and transmitting it to the motor, with optional voltage conversion and braking mechanisms to manage motor speed and direction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If AC motors are used for automated door control systems, then door automation capability is achieved, but control system complexity and electronics requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor automation capabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex AC motor control electronics with a simpler DC motor control system. The controller uses basic electronic components and software to control DC motor speed and direction, eliminating the need for complex AC motor control circuitry while achieving the same door automation function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The controller is designed to be motor-model-agnostic, capable of controlling different DC motor types (brushed and brushless) using the same control architecture. This universal approach simplifies the control system by eliminating the need for motor-specific customization while maintaining automation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If different motor models with different ratings and operating parameters are accommodated, then system versatility is improved, but customization requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotor model compatibilityVSAvoidcustomization requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The controller dynamically adjusts control parameters such as PWM duty cycle, current limits, and speed references based on the specific motor being used. This parameter-based adaptation allows the system to work with different motor models without hardware customization, as the software automatically configures appropriate operating parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback from motor current sensors and encoders to automatically adapt to different motor characteristics. By monitoring actual motor performance and adjusting control signals accordingly, the system achieves versatility across motor models without requiring pre-customization for each motor type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250327353A1Door control system
Publication Date: 2025.10.23 ION GRIGORE
  • US20250327353A1 patent drawing
  • US20250327353A1 patent drawing
  • US20250327353A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A door control system is provided. The control system includes a controller configured to control a door via a motor. The system may accept any input signal and transform the signal to a suitable input signal for the components of the system. The controller may receive commands to actuate the motor to effect movement in the door. The controller may transmit control signals to the motor and adjust the control signals based on the current speed. The system may include a switching element which may create a short circuit condition at motor terminals to effect braking. The system may include a feedback loop to adjust control signals sent to the motor.