Vehicle Door Opening Control for Obstacle-Aware Safe Exit

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a lack of technology to assist passengers in safely exiting a vehicle by controlling the door opening speed to prevent collisions with surrounding obstacles, which is not addressed by existing parking assist systems that use virtual lines.

Innovation Solution

A passenger safe exit assist device that includes a sensor device to detect obstacles and a controller to set virtual lines and control the door opening speed based on the distance and acceleration, allowing for adjustable door opening modes according to the driver's body type and selected mode.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the door is opened quickly to assist passenger exit, then the exit efficiency is improved, but the risk of collision with surrounding obstacles increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexit efficiencyVSAvoidcollision risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The door opening system dynamically adjusts its operation mode between manual and automatic based on real-time obstacle detection. The controller monitors obstacle presence and automatically switches between fast opening (no obstacle) and controlled opening (obstacle present), making the system adaptable to varying conditions rather than fixed in one mode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously receives feedback from sensor devices about obstacle presence and door opening state. Based on this feedback, the controller real-time adjusts the door opening speed and mode, switching between manual and automatic control to prevent collision while maintaining efficiency when safe.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the door opening speed is controlled to prevent collision, then the safety is improved, but the exit efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidexit efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The door opening speed is dynamically adjusted based on obstacle detection results. When no obstacle is detected, the door opens at full speed for efficiency. When obstacles are detected, the speed is controlled to prevent collision. This dynamic adjustment eliminates the need to choose between safety and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the door opening speed parameter based on environmental conditions. The controller adjusts the speed parameter from high (efficient exit) to low (safe operation) depending on obstacle presence, allowing the system to optimize both safety and efficiency under different conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If the door is automatically opened to assist passenger exit, then the ease of operation is improved, but the control precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of exitVSAvoiddoor opening control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The automatic door opening system uses feedback from sensors to monitor obstacle presence and door position. The controller continuously adjusts the opening process based on this feedback, ensuring precise control throughout the motion to prevent collision while maintaining automatic operation benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Before the door completes its opening motion, the system performs preliminary checks for obstacles and prepares to apply counter-torque if needed. This preliminary anti-action prevents potential collision by having the control mechanism ready to intervene before damage can occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

4Strength

If the door opening torque is increased to overcome resistance, then the door opening capability is improved, but the risk of door damage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor opening capabilityVSAvoiddoor damage risk
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies preliminary counter-torque control to prevent the door from opening too quickly or forcefully. By applying opposing torque in advance when obstacles are detected, the system prevents excessive force that could damage the door or surrounding structures, while still allowing normal opening when safe.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The control system provides beforehand cushioning by limiting the maximum torque and speed of door opening. This prevents sudden forceful movement that could cause damage, while still providing sufficient opening capability for normal operation. The system cushions against potential damage before it can occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Data Source

PatentUS12188280B2Passenger safe exit assist device and method thereof
Publication Date: 2025.01.07 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD
  • US12188280B2 patent drawing
  • US12188280B2 patent drawing
  • US12188280B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A passenger safe exit assist device and a method thereof obtain information of an obstacle around a vehicle and a speed at which the door of the vehicle is opened, set a virtual first line along the obstacle, and control the speed at which the door is opened, based on at least one of the first line or the speed. The device and method provide a customer with various safe exit modes such that the customer freely selects a mode and experiences alighting safely from the vehicle.