Motorized Door Operator Electrical Back Check Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional automatic door operators with clutch mechanisms lack a reliable method to simulate the back check function typically provided by hydraulic door closers, which is essential for preventing door damage by applying varying forces as a function of door angle without using pistons, springs, or hydraulic fluid.

Innovation Solution

A motorized door operator that uses electrical control to simulate the back check function by determining the door's position with sensors and exerting a closing force through controlled motor voltage, allowing for adjustable operating parameters and manual operation integration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If hydraulic door closers with pistons, springs, or hydraulic fluid are used to create back check force, then the door can be protected from damage by applying varying forces as a function of door angle, but the device complexity and maintenance requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor protectionVSAvoidmechanical components
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical hydraulic door closer system with an electric motor system. The motor is controlled by a controller that receives signals from a position sensor to determine when the door is in the back check region, and applies electrical torque to create the closing force. This substitution eliminates pistons, springs, and hydraulic fluid while maintaining the door protection function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The door operator system uses its own motor and control system to provide the back check function that would otherwise require a separate hydraulic door closer. The controller monitors door position through the position sensor and autonomously applies the necessary closing force when the door enters the back check region, making the system self-regulating.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Force

If a mechanical door closer with varying force regions is used, then the door can be closed with appropriate force at different angles, but the ease of operation and adjustability are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclosing forceVSAvoidforce adjustment
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic control system where the closing force is not fixed but can be adjusted based on operational requirements. The controller can modify the motor torque output in real-time, and the system includes adjustable parameters that allow the closing force characteristics to be customized for different door weights, sizes, and operational needs, replacing the fixed mechanical force regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows for parameter changes in the closing force through electrical control. The controller can adjust the voltage, current, or pulse width modulation duty cycle to the motor to vary the closing force magnitude. This electrical parameter adjustment provides flexibility without requiring physical reconfiguration of mechanical components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If clutch mechanisms are added to door operators to enable manual operation, then safety during power interruption or obstacle detection is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidclutch mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical clutch mechanism with an electrical control solution. The controller monitors operational conditions and can electrically disengage or reduce motor torque to allow manual door operation when safety conditions are met, eliminating the need for a separate mechanical clutch assembly while achieving the same safety function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The motorized door operator effectively creates a back check force electronically, preventing door damage by applying controlled resistance as the door approaches a specific angle, enhancing safety and functionality without mechanical components like pistons or springs.

Implementation Method 1

The back check force in embodiments of the invention is created by electrical control of the motor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic conversion: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

In some embodiments, the processor determines the position of a door by sensing the proximity of a magnet. In some embodiments, this position sensing is accomplished by a position sensor such as a Hall effect device or Hall effect sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHall effect: Hall Effect

Data Source

PatentUS8390219B2Door operator with electrical back check feature
Publication Date: 2013.03.05 ASSA ABLOY ACCESSORIES & DOOR CONTROLS GRP INC
  • US8390219B2 patent drawing
  • US8390219B2 patent drawing
  • US8390219B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A door operator with an electrical back check feature is disclosed. Embodiments of the present invention are realized by a motorized door operator that electrically creates a back check force for an opening door. The door operator simulates the back check normally created by hydraulic means in convention door closers, but without the use of pistons, springs or hydraulic fluid. The door operator includes a motor disposed to operatively connect to a door so that the door will open when the motor moves, and a position sensor to determine a position of the door. A processor is programmed to exert a closing force on the door in the back check region. In some embodiments, the closing force is exerted by injecting a voltage into the electric motor of the door operator.