Confined Space Door Relocking Control for Low-Power Security

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing door unlocking control systems for securing enclosed spaces, such as fiber cabinets, face challenges with energy consumption and equipment durability, leading to reliability issues and management complexity, especially in environments where a regular energy supply is difficult to maintain.

Innovation Solution

A control system that allows for temporal dissociation of unlocking and opening operations, enabling secure and reliable management of door states through request signal validation and position indicators, with the option for remote control and energy-independent processing, reducing the need for frequent relocking and minimizing energy usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If electronic locks with autonomous battery-powered control systems are used, then ease of operation and flexibility are improved, but energy consumption increases and battery depletion becomes a risk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The control system operates in periodic cycles: remaining in low-power sleep mode between door operations, and activating only when door opening/closing events occur. This periodic activation pattern significantly reduces overall energy consumption while maintaining full operational capability when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the door's own mechanical movement (opening/closing) as the trigger for control operations, eliminating the need for separate sensors or continuous monitoring systems. The door operation itself provides the signal needed to activate the control system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If frequent relocking operations are implemented, then security is improved, but equipment wear increases and reliability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidequipment durability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The relocking timing is made dynamic rather than fixed: the system intelligently determines when relocking should occur based on door position and operational context, delaying relocking when appropriate to reduce wear while maintaining security when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameter of relocking timing from a fixed immediate action to a variable delayed action, adjusting the timing based on actual door usage patterns and security requirements, thereby reducing unnecessary operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If immediate relocking upon door closing is enforced, then security is improved, but operational flexibility decreases and energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidoperational flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The relocking operation is made dynamic and context-dependent rather than immediate and mandatory. The system adapts relocking timing based on whether the door is being closed during normal operation or during an intervention, providing operational flexibility while maintaining security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Ease of manufacture

If autonomous battery-powered control systems are used, then installation simplicity is improved, but system reliability worsens due to battery depletion risks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation simplicityVSAvoidsystem reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control system uses periodic activation based on door events rather than continuous operation, dramatically extending battery life and reducing the risk of depletion while maintaining full functionality when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces complex continuous power management mechanisms with simple event-triggered activation, using the mechanical door operation itself as the trigger signal, thereby simplifying the overall system while improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP4273819A1System and method for controlling the unlocking and re-locking of a door of an enclosed space
Publication Date: 2023.11.08 NDIAYE ISMAILA
  • EP4273819A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4273819A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4273819A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A control system (1) for unlocking a confined space door receives a request signal (41) to unlock the door and a position indicator (42) showing whether the door is open or closed. It verifies this signal and, when the door is in the closed position and the unlocking validation conditions are met by this signal, generates an unlock instruction (43) and transmits it. It also receives a request signal (41) to relock the door, which is temporally distinct from the transition of the position indicator from the open to the closed position. It verifies this signal, generates a relock instruction (43) when a closed position is indicated and the relocking validation conditions are met by this signal, and transmits it. Applications include securing street cabinets for fiber optics.