Door Safety Device with Remote Actuator and Hidden Locking Pin

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing safety devices for doors and windows are either limited to actuation from one side, prone to damage from external forces, or vulnerable to tampering and key cloning systems, lacking structural simplicity and cost-effectiveness.

Innovation Solution

A safety device with a movable locking member actuated by an electric motor and worm screw, controlled remotely, which is invisible and tamper-proof, featuring a cylindrical pin that can be rotated to prevent cutting and a containment body with a battery-powered actuator for secure and versatile operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If traditional locks are used that can be actuated from both sides of the door, then the door can be locked from either side, but the lock becomes vulnerable to damage from external forces and tampering

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuation from both sidesVSAvoidresistance to damage and tampering
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is extracted from the traditional visible lock structure and relocated to an invisible position within the door edge. The locking member is contained within a containment body that is integrated into the door, removing the vulnerable external lock components while preserving the ability to lock from both sides.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

An intermediary containment body is introduced between the external environment and the locking mechanism. This containment body protects the locking member from external forces and tampering while still allowing the locking function to operate from either side of the door.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If visible locks are used on the door, then the locking function is provided, but the lock becomes visible and susceptible to tampering and break-in systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking functionVSAvoidvisibility and susceptibility to tampering
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The visible lock components are extracted and removed from the door surface. The locking mechanism is concealed within the door edge, making it invisible to external observers and immune to visual tampering attempts while maintaining the locking function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The containment body acts as a protective shell that encloses the locking mechanism. This shell protects the internal components from external access and tampering while allowing the locking function to remain operational.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

3Stability of the object's composition

If armoured locks with sliding bars are used, then the door stability on the jamb is improved, but the lock becomes easier to tamper with using forcing systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor stability on jambVSAvoidresistance to forcing systems
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The traditional mechanical forcing systems are replaced with an electric actuator controlled by control means. The locking member is moved by an electric motor rather than manual mechanical force, making it resistant to external forcing attempts while maintaining door stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

An intermediary containment body protects the locking mechanism from external access. This containment body prevents forcing systems from directly accessing the locking components while still allowing the locking function to operate through the controlled actuator.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Device complexity

If simple manual bolts are used, then the device is structurally simple and cost-effective, but the device can only be actuated from the inside of the door

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural simplicityVSAvoidactuation from both sides
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The locking system is designed with multi-functionality to operate from both sides of the door. The actuator and control means are positioned to allow actuation from either side, providing universal operation while maintaining relative structural simplicity through the integrated containment body design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a safe, versatile, and cost-effective safety device that can be actuated from either side, is resistant to damage and tampering, and allows remote control, ensuring secure door locking without visible external components.

Implementation Method 1

an actuator (3), comprising a worm screw (9) and a motor (7)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWorm drive: Worm Drive

Implementation Method 2

an actuator (3), comprising a worm screw (9) and a motor (7)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic conversion: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentEP3390750B1Safety device for doors, windows, mobile doors and similar wings
Publication Date: 2020.07.08 CAMPIRONI G
  • EP3390750B1 patent drawingFigure 1a
  • EP3390750B1 patent drawingFigure 1b
  • EP3390750B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

A safety device for doors, windows, mobile doors and the like, comprising: a locking member(2) movable between a first position in which it obstructs the movement of a respective door (100, 200) or window or mobile door, and a second position in which it does not obstruct the movement of said door (100, 200), window or mobile door; an actuator (3) associated to said locking member (2) to move the element itself in the first and second position; a containment body (4) for said locking member and said actuator, which can be positioned at a zone of passage (A) of the door, window or mobile door; and control means (5) of said actuator, arranged externally to said containment body for activating and/or deactivating the actuator from a remote location.