Vehicle Door Entrapment Detection Sensor Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional door entrapment detection devices may continuously output erroneous determinations due to sensor malfunctions, leading to unreliable door entrapment detection.

Innovation Solution

A door entrapment detection device with an operation verification unit that verifies the operability of the sensor during periods excluding the primary entrapment determination, using the vehicle door's opening and closing cycles to detect sensor functionality without increasing the number of components, and a rotation applying portion to forcibly rotate the rotary body for verification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the sensor continuously monitors the rotary body rotation for door entrapment detection, then the door entrapment detection capability is improved, but the reliability deteriorates due to continuous erroneous outputs when the sensor malfunctions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor entrapment detection reliabilityVSAvoiderroneous determination outputs
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor operates in periodic cycles, alternating between a determination period for door entrapment detection and an operation verification period for sensor functionality checking. This periodic operation prevents continuous erroneous outputs by pausing entrapment detection when sensor malfunction is detected during verification periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by monitoring the sensor's own output signals during operation verification periods. The control unit analyzes whether the sensor responses are consistent with expected behavior during door opening/closing cycles, and uses this feedback to determine whether to trust subsequent entrapment detection outputs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the vehicle door opens and closes to verify sensor operability, then the sensor verification function is improved, but the device complexity increases due to additional verification mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor operability verificationVSAvoidverification system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The door opening/closing operation serves dual purposes: it performs the necessary door entrapment detection function and simultaneously verifies sensor operability. The same sensor outputs during normal door operations are reused for verification, eliminating the need for separate verification hardware or test mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The sensor verifies its own operability by analyzing its own output signals during door opening/closing cycles. The control unit monitors whether the sensor produces expected responses during these cycles, allowing the system to self-diagnose sensor functionality without external verification equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If a rotation applying portion is added to forcibly rotate the rotary body, then the sensor verification accuracy is improved, but the device complexity increases due to additional mechanical components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor verification accuracyVSAvoidmechanical component quantity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sealing portion acts as an intermediary element that naturally comes into contact with and rotates the rotary body during door closing operations. This existing mechanical feature of the door assembly is repurposed to provide the rotation needed for sensor verification, avoiding the need for dedicated rotation actuators or motors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system recovers and utilizes the natural rotational motion that occurs during normal door closing operations. Instead of discarding this motion as incidental, it is captured and used for sensor verification purposes, extracting additional functionality from existing door mechanics without adding rotation-generating components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration significantly reduces the occurrence of erroneous determinations by ensuring the sensor's operability is verified, thereby enhancing the reliability of door entrapment detection and minimizing false alarms.

Implementation Method 1

a sensor configured to detect rotation of a rotary body arranged at a leading end of the vehicle door

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRotation detection:

Implementation Method 2

the central part of the sealing portion deforms more easily than another part of the sealing portion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDeformation: Deformation

Data Source

PatentEP3502389A1Door entrapment detection device and door entrapment detection system
Publication Date: 2019.06.26 NABTESCO CORP
  • EP3502389A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3502389A1 patent drawingFigure 3~5
  • EP3502389A1 patent drawingFigure 6~8

AI summary

A door entrapment detection device (10) includes a determination unit (42) configured to determine, in a predetermined period (T3), whether a vehicle door (3) is in an entrapment state based on an output from a sensor (11) configured to detect rotation of a rotary body (12) arranged at a leading end of the vehicle door (3). The door entrapment detection device (10) further includes an operation verification unit (45) configured to verify whether the sensor (11) is operable based on the output, in a period excluding the predetermined period (T3).