Door System Status Modeling for Predictive Wear Maintenance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current door system maintenance methods often result in unnecessary work and downtime due to fixed schedules, leading to inefficient identification and repair of wear and defects, which can only be detected after faults occur.

Innovation Solution

A method using a model with first and second model blocks to determine the status of a door system by analyzing measurement information, allowing for predictive and time-optimized maintenance by identifying wear in specific subsystems and scheduling maintenance accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If maintenance is carried out at fixed time intervals, then maintenance scheduling is simplified, but unnecessary maintenance work and downtime increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance schedulingVSAvoiddowntime
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary monitoring and analysis of measurement information to detect signs of wear before they lead to actual faults. By identifying wear early through the model-based status determination, maintenance can be scheduled optimally rather than following fixed intervals, thus reducing unnecessary downtime while avoiding premature maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors the door system's status through measurement information and uses a model to compare actual status against expected status. This feedback loop enables dynamic adjustment of maintenance timing based on actual wear progression, replacing fixed-schedule maintenance with condition-based maintenance that reduces unnecessary downtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If maintenance is carried out at fixed time intervals, then maintenance planning is simplified, but signs of wear are only identified after faults occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance planningVSAvoidfault detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of wear signs by analyzing measurement information through a model before faults actually occur. This early detection capability allows maintenance to be planned based on actual wear status rather than waiting for faults to manifest, improving reliability while maintaining planning simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces traditional mechanical inspection methods with a model-based diagnostic approach that analyzes measurement information (such as current, speed, position data) to detect wear signs. This substitution enables earlier and more reliable fault detection while keeping the maintenance planning process simple and automated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of repair

If specialist personnel travel to examine or repair the door device, then thorough inspection is possible, but maintenance time and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection qualityVSAvoidmaintenance time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of repairVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The door system performs self-diagnosis by continuously monitoring its own status through measurement information and comparing it against a model. This self-service capability identifies wear signs and generates maintenance indications without requiring constant specialist intervention, thereby reducing maintenance time and costs while maintaining inspection quality through automated monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces physical inspection by specialist personnel with an automated electronic monitoring and diagnostic system. The model-based status determination analyzes measurement information to identify wear signs, providing thorough inspection capability through electronic means that reduces both time and cost compared to manual specialist visits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If comprehensive maintenance is performed on the entire door device, then all potential issues are addressed, but resource and cost expenditure increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidmaintenance resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the door device into individual subsystems (drive unit, gear unit, motor, tab carriage, etc.) and monitors each separately through a modular model structure. This segmentation allows maintenance to be targeted at specific worn components rather than performing comprehensive maintenance on the entire device, reducing resource and cost expenditure while maintaining system reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies local quality monitoring by focusing measurement and analysis resources on specific subsystems that show signs of wear. The model identifies which particular component (gear unit, motor, etc.) requires attention, enabling targeted maintenance that conserves resources while ensuring reliability by addressing only the necessary local issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20220406163A1Method for determining and/or verifying a status of a door system, method for generating a model, status determination device, system, computer program product
Publication Date: 2022.12.22 DORMAKABA DEUT GMBH
  • US20220406163A1 patent drawing
  • US20220406163A1 patent drawing
  • US20220406163A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for determining and/or verifying a status of a door system, wherein the door system has at least one first subsystem and one second subsystem, includes thefollowing stepsdetermining at least one item of measurement information relating to the door system is determined in a measuring step, and determining and/or verifyingthe status of the door system using a model and using the at least one determined item of measurement information in a status determination step, wherein the model has a first model block for the first subsystem and a second model block for the second subsystem.