Vehicle Door Control Element With Separate Inner and Outer Touch Zones

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern vehicle doors often lack intuitive and comfortable control elements, especially in designs that eliminate mechanical handles, making it difficult for users to operate the door correctly, particularly in emergency situations where third-party access is needed.

Innovation Solution

The vehicle door assembly features a control element with distinct outer and inner portions, each equipped with separate operating devices that generate signals for closing and opening functions, allowing users to intuitively operate the door by touching the appropriate portion, thereby reducing the risk of incorrect operation and enhancing user comfort.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a stationary control element is provided on the vehicle door without mechanical adjustment, then the device complexity is reduced and security is improved, but the ease of operation deteriorates because users cannot intuitively distinguish between opening and closing functions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol element structureVSAvoidintuitive operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control element is segmented into two distinct functional zones: an outer portion with first operating devices for closing functions and an inner portion with second operating devices for opening functions. This segmentation allows each zone to have dedicated control surfaces, making the function differentiation intuitive while maintaining a compact, stationary design without mechanical adjustment components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different portions of the control element are assigned different functions based on their spatial location. The outer portion is dedicated to closing operations while the inner portion is dedicated to opening operations. This local quality differentiation enables users to intuitively understand the function of each area, improving ease of operation despite the simplified stationary structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Device complexity

If the control element is made compact to save space, then the device complexity is reduced, but the ease of operation deteriorates because little space is available for control surfaces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol element designVSAvoidcontrol surface area
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control element utilizes both the outer surface and inner surface as functional dimensions. By distributing control surfaces across these different spatial dimensions (outer portion for closing, inner portion for opening), the design maximizes the available control surface area within a compact form factor, resolving the contradiction between compactness and operational ease.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Ease of operation

If separate operating devices are provided on both outer and inner portions, then the ease of operation is improved through intuitive control, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintuitive operationVSAvoidoperating device configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple operating devices are merged into integrated sensor systems on the control element. The first operating devices on the outer portion and second operating devices on the inner portion are combined with the control device to form a unified system that automatically distinguishes between opening and closing intentions based on which portion is actuated, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining intuitive operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20230323727A1Assembly of a vehicle with a control element arranged on a vehicle door
Publication Date: 2023.10.12 BROSE FAHRZEUGTEILE GMBH & CO KG
  • US20230323727A1 patent drawing
  • US20230323727A1 patent drawing
  • US20230323727A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An assembly of a vehicle comprises a vehicle door, a control element arranged on a door portion of the vehicle door, and a control device for controlling a closing function for closing the vehicle door and an opening function for opening the vehicle door. The control element comprises at least one first operating device for generating an operating signal on user operation at an outer portion and at least one second operating device for generating an operating signal on user operation at an inner portion. The control device is configured to trigger a closing function for closing the vehicle door with reference to an operating signal of the at least one first operating device and to trigger an opening function for opening the vehicle door with reference to an operating signal of the at least one second operating device.