Door Trim Coupling Structure for Crash-Resistant Armrest and Pull-Cup Assembly

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Two-part door trim assemblies with armrest and pull-cup units tend to separate during crashes due to deformation, posing safety risks and failing to meet regulatory standards for maintaining a flush interior during and after impacts.

Innovation Solution

A coupling structure featuring fins and flanges that overlap and connect the armrest and pull-cup units in an alternating fashion, with an attachment member securing them together, allowing for rotational movement to absorb deformation without separating, thus maintaining structural integrity and compliance with safety standards.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a two-part construction is used for the armrest and pull-cup assembly, then manufacturing cost and assembly ease are improved, but the assembly may separate during crash events

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidseparation resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The armrest assembly is divided into two separate units: an armrest unit and a pull-cup unit. This segmentation allows for independent manufacturing and assembly of each component, reducing overall manufacturing complexity and cost while maintaining the functional integrity of the complete assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The coupling structure utilizes a multi-dimensional fin arrangement where fins extend in multiple directions (first direction, second direction, third direction perpendicular to the first two). This three-dimensional overlapping fin configuration creates a robust mechanical interlock that resists separation forces from crash events while maintaining the two-part construction benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of operation

If a two-part construction is used for the armrest and pull-cup assembly, then assembly ease is improved, but the assembly may separate during crash events

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly easeVSAvoidseparation resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The assembly is segmented into modular components (armrest unit and pull-cup unit) that can be independently manufactured and assembled. The coupling structure provides a straightforward mechanical connection using fins and attachment members, simplifying the assembly process while ensuring crash resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The coupling structure employs fins extending in multiple perpendicular directions (first, second, and third directions) to create a multi-dimensional mechanical interlock. This three-dimensional arrangement simplifies assembly by providing inherent alignment and mechanical strength without requiring complex fastening mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If a rigid coupling is used to prevent separation, then separation resistance is improved, but the assembly cannot absorb deformation during crash

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation resistanceVSAvoiddeformation absorption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The coupling structure incorporates rotational movement capability around a pivot axis, transforming the coupling from a static rigid connection to a dynamic articulated connection. This allows the armrest unit and pull-cup unit to rotate relative to each other during crash events, absorbing deformation energy while maintaining connection integrity and preventing separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The coupling structure changes its mechanical parameters during operation: under normal conditions, the fins provide a rigid mechanical interlock for separation resistance; during crash events, the structure enables rotational movement to absorb deformation. This parameter change from rigid to articulated behavior allows the coupling to adapt to different loading conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If fins extend far from the pivot axis to increase leverage, then separation resistance is improved, but stress on the attachment member increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation resistanceVSAvoidattachment member stress
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The coupling structure features localized reinforcement at critical stress points, particularly at the pivot axis and attachment member connection points. The fin configuration is optimized with varying dimensions and positioning to distribute stresses locally, providing enhanced separation resistance through strategic placement of structural features rather than uniform reinforcement throughout.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS9156387B2Coupling structure for pull-cup and armrest assembly
Publication Date: 2015.10.13 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US9156387B2 patent drawing
  • US9156387B2 patent drawing
  • US9156387B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A door trim assembly includes an armrest, a pull-cup unit, and an attachment structure. The attachment structure has a first portion with a first flange, a second portion with two second flanges on opposing sides of the first flange, and an attachment member engaged with the at least one first flange and the at least two second flanges. The first and second portions are respectively coupled to one each of the armrest and the pull-cup unit, which may prevent separation during and after a crash event.