Vehicle Door Collision Avoidance via Vision Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle hatch systems lack effective collision avoidance mechanisms, particularly when opening or closing, as they fail to detect objects in their path, leading to potential collisions and injuries.

Innovation Solution

A vision system utilizing one or more cameras to capture images of the area swept by the vehicle hatch, processing image data to detect objects and control the hatch's movement, stopping or reversing it to avoid collisions, and maintaining a safe gap even when the vehicle's body height changes during loading or unloading.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the hatch is opened or closed without object detection, then the operation is simple and fast, but collision with objects may occur causing injury or damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision avoidanceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical collision avoidance mechanisms with an optical detection system (camera) and electronic control system. The camera captures images of the hatch path, the processor analyzes the images to detect objects, and the control system adjusts the hatch movement accordingly, substituting mechanical sensing with optical and electronic systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary control system between the hatch actuator and the hatch itself. This intermediary system includes the camera, image processor, and control unit that mediate the hatch's movement by detecting objects and adjusting the opening/closing action to prevent collisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the hatch stops or reverses to avoid collision, then safety is improved, but the operation time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidoperation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary object detection before the hatch completes its opening or closing motion. By detecting objects in the hatch path in advance and preemptively stopping or reversing the hatch movement, the system prevents collisions before they occur, maintaining safety while minimizing unnecessary delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback control system where the camera continuously monitors the hatch path, the processor analyzes the detected objects, and the control system adjusts the hatch movement in real-time based on this feedback. This closed-loop control ensures safety while optimizing operation time by making adjustments only when necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If the hatch maintains a fixed position, then the control is simple, but it cannot accommodate changes in vehicle body height during loading or unloading

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheight adaptationVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from a static hatch position control system to a dynamic one. The hatch position is continuously adjusted based on real-time detection of objects and changes in vehicle body height. The control system modifies the hatch's opening/closing behavior dynamically to maintain safe clearance while accommodating loading and unloading operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses feedback from the camera and image processor to continuously monitor the hatch's environment and adjust the hatch position accordingly. This feedback mechanism enables the system to adapt to changing conditions such as vehicle body height variations during loading or unloading, maintaining safety without requiring complex predetermined control sequences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10072453B2Vehicle door control system
Publication Date: 2018.09.11 MAGNA ELECTRONICS INC
  • US10072453B2 patent drawing
  • US10072453B2 patent drawing
  • US10072453B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle door control system includes a camera disposed at a portion of the vehicle and having a field of view that encompasses a region exterior of the vehicle that is swept by a door of the vehicle as the door is opened and closed via a powered door opening/closing system of the vehicle. An image processor is operable to process image data captured by the camera to detect an object present in the region that is swept by the door when the door is opening and to determine if the door may collide with the detected object when the door is being opened. During opening of the door and responsive to determination of a potential collision of the opening door with the detected object, the vehicle door control system positions the door at a partially open position whereby a gap is established between the door and the detected object.