Doorway Transaction Barrier With Segmented Access Zones

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing transactional door designs lack a combination of a transparent upper window and a solid lower portion with a hinged access door to minimize human contact during monetary transactions, and are not efficiently or economically implemented.

Innovation Solution

A doorway transaction barrier featuring a cabin assembly with a transparent front barrier, a hinged front door, and a slidable drawer system, mounted easily to any door frame using a latch system, allowing for safe interaction while minimizing contact between shopkeepers and customers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a traditional transactional door design is used, then human contact is required for monetary transactions, but this increases the risk of disease transmission and reduces safety

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidhuman contact requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The transactional door is segmented into multiple functional zones: an upper transparent window section for viewing and communication, a lower solid portion with access opening for product retrieval, and a drawer section for monetary transactions. This segmentation allows different types of interactions (visual, physical access, monetary exchange) to occur simultaneously without requiring direct human contact, thereby maintaining safety while preserving ease of operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A drawer mechanism serves as an intermediary device for monetary transactions. The drawer can be extended from inside the secured area to the outside, allowing money exchange without the transactioner needing to physically approach or contact the other party. This intermediary mechanism resolves the contradiction by enabling easy monetary transactions while maintaining safety barriers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If existing transactional door designs are implemented, then some form of human contact or direct access is necessary, but this fails to provide adequate barrier protection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebarrier protectionVSAvoiddesign complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The door structure is divided into three main segments: upper transparent window, lower solid portion with access opening, and drawer mechanism. Each segment performs a specific function (communication, product access, monetary transaction), providing comprehensive barrier protection while keeping each individual component relatively simple and manageable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The transactional door design integrates multiple functions into a single unified structure: the upper window enables visual contact and communication, the lower opening allows product retrieval, and the drawer facilitates monetary exchanges. This multi-functionality provides robust barrier protection without requiring multiple separate devices, thereby controlling overall complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If a comprehensive barrier system with multiple access points is created, then safety and contact reduction are improved, but manufacturing and installation costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontact reductionVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The barrier system is segmented into modular components (upper window assembly, lower solid portion, drawer mechanism) that can be manufactured separately and assembled together. This modularity reduces manufacturing complexity and cost compared to creating a single complex integrated structure, while still providing comprehensive contact reduction through multiple access points

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The drawer mechanism is designed to be self-contained and self-operating, extending and retracting on its own to facilitate monetary transactions without requiring additional manual operations or complex control systems. This self-service capability reduces manufacturing costs by eliminating the need for motors, sensors, or automated control mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11927047B1Doorway transaction barrier
Publication Date: 2024.03.12 THOMAS FLOYD
  • US11927047B1 patent drawing
  • US11927047B1 patent drawing
  • US11927047B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A doorway transaction barrier including a cabin assembly, a chamber assembly and a mounting assembly is disclosed herein. The cabin assembly includes cabin including a front barrier having a front opening. The front barrier further including a two-way microphone to provide communication between a first user and a second user. The chamber assembly including a front wall, a left wall, a right wall and a top wall. The top wall having the cabin assembly mounted thereon. The front wall including a front door to provide access to a front chamber. The top wall including a second door to provide access to the front chamber from an interior side of the cabin. The top wall further including rails receiving a slidable drawer. The front opening providing access to the drawer. The mounting assembly includes a latch to mount the chamber assembly to a frame door.