Pulse Wave Doppler Cycle Screening for Reliable RI Measurement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing Doppler ultrasound measurements for carotid artery assessment in stroke screening are prone to inaccuracies due to low-quality cardiac cycles caused by motion or high heart rate variability, leading to unreliable Resistance Index (RI) values and increased clinician workload.

Innovation Solution

A system that automatically identifies and excludes low-quality cardiac cycles based on heart rate variability and acquisition quality from spectral Doppler data, providing a visual indication and calculating RI using high-quality cycles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If clinicians average measurements over several cardiac cycles to improve measurement reliability, then measurement reliability improves, but measurement precision deteriorates due to inclusion of low-quality cycles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement reliabilityVSAvoidmeasurement precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the cardiac cycles into individual units that can be independently evaluated for quality. Each cardiac cycle is analyzed separately using quality metrics (such as spectral quality, heart rate variability, and motion artifacts) to determine whether it meets the threshold for inclusion in measurements. This segmentation allows clinicians to selectively average only the high-quality cycles, thereby maintaining both reliability and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality assessment by evaluating specific characteristics of each cardiac cycle (such as spectral density, signal-to-noise ratio, and presence of artifacts) rather than treating all cycles uniformly. This enables identification of locally problematic cycles that should be excluded, ensuring that the averaging process includes only cycles with adequate local quality metrics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If manual correction of low-quality cycles is performed to improve measurement precision, then measurement precision improves, but ease of operation deteriorates due to increased workload

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement precisionVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service by enabling the ultrasound system to automatically identify, evaluate, and exclude low-quality cardiac cycles without requiring manual intervention. The system autonomously calculates quality metrics for each cycle, compares them against predetermined thresholds, and selectively averages the high-quality cycles. This automation eliminates the need for clinicians to manually review and correct each cycle, significantly reducing workload while maintaining measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms that provide real-time information to clinicians about the quality of acquired cardiac cycles. The system displays quality indicators and automatically adjusts the averaging process based on the detected quality levels, creating a closed-loop system that continuously optimizes measurement accuracy without requiring manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If clinicians maintain probe stillness and minimize patient movement to improve measurement precision, then measurement precision improves, but productivity deteriorates due to extended examination time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement precisionVSAvoidexamination efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-establishing quality thresholds and automated selection criteria before the examination begins. The system is pre-programmed with the metrics and thresholds needed to evaluate cardiac cycle quality, allowing it to rapidly process and select appropriate cycles during the examination without requiring real-time manual adjustment or prolonged acquisition times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Improves measurement accuracy and reduces user workload by ensuring reliable RI calculations through automated exclusion of low-quality data, enhancing the consistency and reliability of Doppler parameter measurements.

Implementation Method 1

transmitting an ultrasound signal into a subject and receiving a reflected wave from the subject

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDoppler effect: Doppler Effect

Implementation Method 2

transmitting an ultrasound signal into a subject and receiving a reflected wave from the subject

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectUltrasonic wave reflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS20260053462A1Measurements from pulse wave doppler ultrasound
Publication Date: 2026.02.26 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV
  • US20260053462A1 patent drawing
  • US20260053462A1 patent drawing
  • US20260053462A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An ultrasound imaging system (100) may automatically analyze a pulse wave Doppler spectrogram to determine high quality and low quality cardiac cycles. Based on the determination, the ultrasound imaging system (100) may exclude the low quality cardiac cycle from being used in calculations of parameter measurements such as peak systolic velocity, end diastolic velocity, and resistance index. In some examples, the ultrasound imaging system (100) may provide a visual indication on the display (138) which cardiac cycles were excluded from the measurements.