DOR Cooler Monitoring via Temperature Curve Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for monitoring the operation of ozone-oxygen conversion systems in vehicles, particularly the installation site and functionality of catalytically coated DOR coolers, are inefficient at lower temperatures and prone to manipulation, failing to reliably detect system faults and ensure regulatory compliance.

Innovation Solution

A method and device that evaluate the temperature characteristics of the heat exchanger outlet and DOR sensor over a defined time interval, forming a relation between the two curves to generate a validity signal, using area differences and quotients compared to setpoint ranges, allowing for reliable diagnosis and fault detection even at lower temperatures with reduced technical effort.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If temperature characteristics are evaluated using conventional methods, then installation monitoring is possible, but the system becomes vulnerable to manipulation and fails at lower temperatures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection reliabilityVSAvoidmanipulation vulnerability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors temperature characteristics and compares them against expected patterns to generate feedback signals. When temperature gradients deviate from expected ranges or patterns, the system generates diagnostic signals indicating potential manipulation or malfunction, creating a feedback loop that detects harmful factors in real-time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces simple mechanical temperature sensing with an electronic evaluation system that processes temperature characteristics electronically. The evaluation of temperature gradients, areas under curves, and temporal patterns is performed through electronic control units, making the system more resistant to physical manipulation while maintaining monitoring capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If temperature monitoring is performed at lower temperatures, then broader operational range is achieved, but detection precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature rangeVSAvoiddetection precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from monitoring temperature at a single point to evaluating temperature characteristics across multiple dimensions: spatial temperature gradients, temporal temperature patterns, and areas under temperature-time curves. This multi-dimensional evaluation maintains precision even at lower temperatures by capturing the overall thermal behavior pattern rather than relying on single-point measurements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the evaluation parameters from simple temperature values to temperature gradients, area under curves, and temporal characteristics. By transforming the measurement approach to evaluate the rate of change and integrated behavior of temperature over time and space, the system maintains detection precision across a broader temperature range including lower temperatures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If complex monitoring systems are implemented, then detection capability improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault detection capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The evaluation system is designed to perform multiple monitoring functions using a unified approach. The same electronic control unit evaluates installation correctness, detects manipulation attempts, monitors operational status, and generates diagnostic signals all through processing temperature characteristics. This multi-functionality reduces overall system complexity compared to having separate dedicated systems for each monitoring task

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables reliable detection of DOR system functionality and prevention of manipulation, satisfying regulatory requirements by effectively diagnosing correct installation and operation across a broader temperature range with reduced complexity and effort.

Implementation Method 1

a so-called DOR (Direct Ozone Reduction) cooler (for example, PremAIRĀ® cooler). This catalytically coated cooler converts the ozone O3 which occurs at ground level and which is contained in the air flowing through it into oxygen O2 by the heat energy of a radiator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

a catalytically coated heat exchanger through or around which air flows and through which a heat exchange medium flows

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat exchange: Heat Exchanger

Data Source

PatentUS8171779B2Method and device for monitoring an ozone-oxygen conversion means, especially for vehicles
Publication Date: 2012.05.08 AUDI AG
  • US8171779B2 patent drawing
  • US8171779B2 patent drawing
  • US8171779B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of monitoring a heat exchanger of a vehicle, coated with an ozone-oxygen conversion material, including detecting the heat exchange medium temperature (tka) and heat exchange temperature (tprem) and plotting the values as a function of time, determining the area value (atka) of the heat exchange medium temperature, comparing the value of the heat exchange medium temperature with a setpoint value, repeating the foregoing steps if the sensed value is negative relative to the setpoint value, devising a quotient of the area values of such temperature, comparing the devised quotient with a defined setpoint range (RA) and determining whether such devised quotient falls within or without such defined setpoint range.