Dosing Conduit Flow Guides for Exhaust Mixing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Diesel engine exhaust aftertreatment systems face inefficiencies due to incomplete mixing of reactants with exhaust gases, leading to deposit buildup and potential clogging, which reduces system efficiency and prevents exhaust flow.

Innovation Solution

The introduction of flow guides within the dosing conduit of the aftertreatment device, which induce swirling of reactants and exhaust gases to enhance mixing, thereby reducing deposit formation and clogging risks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If reactant is injected into exhaust gas without flow guides, then the dosing system is simple, but mixing efficiency is poor and deposit buildup occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedosing system simplicityVSAvoidmixing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The dosing conduit is segmented into multiple functional regions: an injection region for reactant introduction, a swirl region with flow guides for mixing, and a perforated region for exhaust interaction. This segmentation allows each region to perform its specific function optimally, improving mixing efficiency while maintaining manufacturing simplicity through modular design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Flow guides act as intermediary elements between the reactant injection point and the exhaust gas flow. These guides mediate the interaction by inducing swirl motion that enhances mixing without requiring complex injection systems, thus improving productivity while keeping the overall system simple

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Duration of action of moving object

If reactant injection continues without flow guides, then dosing operation is continuous, but deposit buildup clogs the system

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous dosing operationVSAvoidsystem clogging
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The flow guides perform preliminary mixing action immediately after reactant injection, creating swirl motion that prevents deposit formation before it can occur. This preliminary action ensures continuous operation can proceed without clogging by addressing the mixing issue at its source

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system converts the potential harm of continuous reactant injection (which causes deposit buildup) into a benefit by using the continuous flow itself to sustain swirl motion in the flow guides. This continuous motion prevents deposition while maintaining dosing operation, transforming what was a problem into a solution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Productivity

If flow guides are added to induce swirling, then mixing efficiency improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemixing efficiencyVSAvoiddosing conduit structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The flow guides are confined to a specific swirl region within the dosing conduit, segmented from the injection and perforated regions. This localized approach improves mixing efficiency only where needed without complicating the entire dosing system, maintaining manufacturing simplicity in non-swirl areas

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The flow guides provide more mixing action than strictly necessary (excessive action) within the swirl region, ensuring thorough mixing of reactant and exhaust. This partial concentration of complexity in one region allows the rest of the system to remain simple, achieving high productivity without overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Productivity

If flow guides extend along entire dosing conduit, then mixing occurs throughout, but manufacturing complexity and material usage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemixing coverageVSAvoidconduit material usage
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The dosing conduit is segmented into distinct regions with flow guides present only in the swirl region, not throughout the entire conduit. This segmentation reduces material usage while maintaining effective mixing coverage by concentrating flow guides where they are most needed for reactant-exhaust interaction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The flow guides provide enhanced mixing quality locally in the swirl region where reactant and exhaust first interact. This local quality approach ensures adequate mixing coverage at the critical interface without requiring flow guides throughout the entire conduit length, reducing material consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Improved mixing of reactants with exhaust gases reduces deposit formation and clogging, maintaining system efficiency and ensuring proper exhaust flow through the aftertreatment device.

Implementation Method 1

The flow guides surround at least a portion of the spray zone and induce swirling to mix the reactant with the exhaust

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSwirling flow: Vortex Ring

Implementation Method 2

Exhaust entering the aftertreatment device flows towards the dosing conduit and enters the dosing conduit through a perforated region

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas flow through perforations: Porosity

Data Source

PatentEP3997314B1Dosing conduit arrangements for exhaust aftertreatment system
Publication Date: 2024.03.06 DONALDSON CO INC
  • EP3997314B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3997314B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3997314B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An aftertreatment device includes flow guides disposed within a dosing conduit. Exhaust enters through a perforated region of the dosing conduit and passes through the flow guides. The flow guides induce swirling or other turbulence to mix injected reactant with the exhaust gas. Various types of flow guides include cantilevered vanes, guide passageways, and louvered openings of a second conduit. Some types of flow guides induce localized mixing to inhibit deposit formation at the doser mounting unit. Other types of flow guides induce mixing downstream of the dosing conduit.