Dosing Unit Control with Adaptive Parameter Sets

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing dosing units for granular materials, such as seed and fertilizer, require complex and time-consuming manual adjustments to adapt to changing operating conditions, leading to suboptimal distribution and increased operational costs due to the need for frequent recalibration.

Innovation Solution

A method for controlling a dosing unit with predefined sets of parameters that automatically adjust based on operating states, using a sensor unit to detect material flow and adjust the dosing rate, allowing for quick adaptation to changing conditions through varying measurement intervals, aggressiveness, and permissible measured value deviations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If manual adjustment and recalibration of the dosing unit is performed, then the dosing accuracy can be maintained under changing operating conditions, but the time consumption and operational complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedosing accuracyVSAvoidtime consumption for recalibration
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-calibration by automatically detecting material flow with sensor units and adjusting dosing parameters without manual intervention. The control unit continuously monitors operating conditions and adapts dosing rates autonomously, eliminating the need for operators to perform time-consuming manual recalibration while maintaining dosing accuracy under varying conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Sensor units detect the actual material flow and feed this information back to the control unit, which then adjusts the dosing unit parameters accordingly. This closed-loop feedback system enables automatic adaptation to changing operating conditions, maintaining dosing precision without requiring manual recalibration interventions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Stability of the object's composition

If frequent recalibration of the dosing unit is performed to adapt to changing operating conditions, then the dosing consistency is improved, but the operational efficiency decreases due to repeated interruptions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedosing consistencyVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The dosing unit continuously self-adjusts by detecting material flow characteristics and automatically modifying dosing parameters. This eliminates the need for operators to stop work for recalibration, maintaining dosing consistency while keeping the system running without interruptions, thus preserving operational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The automatic control system enables continuous dosing operation without interruptions for recalibration. The sensor units and control unit work continuously to maintain optimal dosing parameters, ensuring both dosing consistency and uninterrupted productivity throughout the operating cycle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Adaptability or versatility

If the dosing unit is designed to be highly adaptable to different operating conditions, then the versatility is improved, but the device complexity increases due to multiple control operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to operating conditionsVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A single integrated control unit performs multiple functions: it receives signals from sensor units, processes operating condition data, calculates optimal dosing parameters, and controls the dosing mechanism. This multi-functional design provides high adaptability to various operating conditions while avoiding the complexity of separate dedicated control systems for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The sensor units, control unit, and dosing mechanism are integrated into a unified system where the control unit consolidates signal processing, parameter calculation, and actuation control. This merging of functions reduces the number of separate control operations and simplifies the overall device architecture while maintaining versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Manufacturing precision

If manual monitoring and adjustment of material flow is performed, then the dosing precision can be maintained, but the labor requirement and operational burden on the driver increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedosing precisionVSAvoidoperational burden
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system autonomously monitors material flow through sensor units and automatically adjusts dosing parameters without requiring driver intervention. This self-service capability maintains dosing precision while completely eliminating the operational burden of manual monitoring and adjustment from the driver.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical adjustment by the driver is replaced with an automated electronic control system comprising sensor units and a control unit that electronically regulate the dosing mechanism. This substitution maintains dosing precision while removing the physical and cognitive burden from the operator.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables rapid and accurate dosing unit calibration to different operating states, reducing manual intervention and ensuring consistent material distribution, even during changes in operating conditions like restarts or material type changes, thereby improving efficiency and reducing costs.

Implementation Method 1

The at least one sensor unit can, in particular, operate according to a piezoelectric sensor principle and thereby detect all granules carried in the airflow and passing through the sensor unit by mechanical action

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoelectric sensor principle: Piezoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 2

The material is divided by a distribution unit and conveyed by means of an airflow via connecting lines to a specific number of application devices

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAirflow conveyance: Convection

Data Source

PatentEP3100604B1Method for controlling a dosing unit for dosing granulate distributed goods and dosing unit for same
Publication Date: 2021.11.03 HORSCH MASCHEN
  • EP3100604B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3100604B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3100604B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method for controlling a metering unit for dosing granular material is disclosed, wherein at least one sensor unit detects at least a portion of the quantity of material being directed to at least one dispensing device within a specific measuring interval, from which the total quantity of material dispensed by the metering unit within the measuring interval can be determined. The at least one sensor unit is connected to a computer and/or evaluation unit by means of which the metering unit can be controlled and/or calibrated. The computer and/or evaluation unit has at least two predefined parameter sets (48, 50), each consisting of at least one parameter, with which the detection of at least the portion of the quantity of material is parameterized and which are used for the process of determining the total quantity of material.Upon reaching a specific initial operating state (44), the first parameter set (48), which comprises a first measurement interval, is applied, and the control of the dosing device is then adapted to the initial operating state (44). Upon reaching a specific second operating state (46), the system switches to at least the second parameter set (50), which comprises a second measurement interval, the second measurement interval being shorter than the first measurement interval, and the control of the dosing device is then adapted to the second operating state (46). After a specific interval length has elapsed and/or after a specific number of measurement intervals have elapsed and/or after the onset of the initial operating state (44), the system switches back to the first parameter set (48).