Double Breakout Sliding Door Pivot Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Automatic sliding door systems typically break open outward, which can be damaged by large or heavily loaded equipment and require complex resetting, and lack the ability to break inward for fire safety and operational efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A double breakout sliding door system that allows both outward and inward opening, featuring a motor-driven mechanism with pivot rods and interlocking latches to maintain door alignment and support, enabling level operation and easy resetting by pivoting the doors about pivot pins.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the door breaks open outward only, then fire safety egress is ensured, but the door is vulnerable to damage from large or heavily loaded equipment and requires complex resetting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire safety egressVSAvoiddoor damage from equipment
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies inversion by enabling the door to break open in both outward and inward directions, reversing the conventional single-direction limitation. This allows the door to swing inward to avoid damage from equipment while maintaining outward breaking capability for fire safety egress, thus resolving the contradiction between safety and damage vulnerability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamics through the rod and pivot pin mechanism that allows the door to dynamically adapt its breaking direction based on the situation. The door can pivot about the rod to break outward for safety or inward to avoid equipment damage, providing dynamic responsiveness rather than a fixed single-direction design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If the door breaks open outward only, then fire code compliance is achieved, but resetting the door requires lifting heavy doors which is time-consuming and complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire code complianceVSAvoiddoor resetting operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies inversion by allowing the door to break inward as an alternative to outward breaking. When equipment damage is a concern, the door can swing inward and reset without requiring lifting, thus simplifying the resetting operation while maintaining outward breaking capability for fire code compliance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the lifting requirement from the resetting process by enabling inward breaking. When the door breaks inward, the nose remains elevated and the door can be reset by simply pushing it back into place, eliminating the need to lift heavy doors and significantly simplifying the resetting operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Device complexity

If the door is designed for single-direction breaking, then the structure is simpler, but the system lacks versatility for different operational scenarios

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor structureVSAvoidbreaking direction capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by designing the door system to perform multiple functions: it can break outward for fire safety egress, break inward to avoid equipment damage, and maintain level operation for normal use. The rod and pivot pin mechanism enables this multi-functionality without significantly increasing structural complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamics through the rod and pivot pin mechanism that allows the door to dynamically adapt its breaking direction based on the situation. The door can pivot about the rod to break outward for safety or inward to avoid equipment damage, providing dynamic responsiveness rather than a fixed single-direction design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9637970B1Double breakout sliding door system
Publication Date: 2017.05.02 LANDERT GRP AG
  • US9637970B1 patent drawing
  • US9637970B1 patent drawing
  • US9637970B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a double breakout sliding door system for use in retail and other buildings. The system includes left and right doors that are configured to slide open and closed and also breakout in two directions (outward and inward) when a force is exerted on the doors in order to, for example, allow customers and employees to exit a building in the event of a fire and to prevent damage to the doors in the event that a user pushes on them when they are closed. The system also includes a leveling system configured to keep the doors level when they breakout and a ball detent mechanism to alert the user to the proper position of the doors.