Double Crossover Merging Interchange Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing interchanges lack a compact footprint, result in significant at-grade conflicts and lane weaving, require multiple flyover bridges, and are costly to construct, especially in terms of acquiring right-of-way, and often necessitate signal-controlled intersections and cloverleaf turns.

Innovation Solution

A Double Crossover Merging Interchange (DCMI) design featuring a main bridge crossover and two minor bridge crossovers that allow pathways to cross without intersecting at grade, eliminating the need for signal control and reducing weaving patterns, while maintaining free-flowing traffic and minimizing the number of flyover bridges.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If traditional interchange designs are used, then traffic flow can be maintained, but the footprint is large and construction costs are high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterchange footprintVSAvoidconstruction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from at-grade intersections to elevated bridge structures, utilizing the vertical dimension to separate traffic flows. The main bridge and minor bridges create grade-separated pathways that eliminate the need for large horizontal right-of-way while reducing construction costs compared to traditional flyover interchanges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If at-grade signal-controlled intersections are used, then the footprint is compact, but at-grade conflicts and lane weaving are significant

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveat-grade conflictVSAvoidsignal control requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent eliminates at-grade conflicts by vertically separating traffic streams through bridge structures. The main bridge carries through-traffic while minor bridges handle turning movements, completely removing conflict points that would otherwise require signal control and complex intersection management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If multiple flyover bridges are used, then at-grade conflicts are reduced, but construction costs and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveat-grade conflictVSAvoidnumber of flyover bridges
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple bridge functions into a unified structure. The main bridge and two minor bridges work together as an integrated system where the minor bridges attach to the main bridge, allowing turning movements to be handled at grade while through-traffic flows overhead, reducing the total number of separate flyover structures needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments traffic flows by function: the main bridge handles through-traffic while minor bridges handle turning movements. This segmentation allows each bridge component to be optimized for its specific purpose, reducing overall complexity compared to traditional designs where all movements require separate elevated structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Ease of operation

If cloverleaf turns are used, then traffic can flow continuously, but the footprint is large and weaving patterns occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous traffic flowVSAvoidinterchange footprint
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces horizontal cloverleaf loops with vertical bridge structures. Minor bridges provide continuous flow for turning movements by carrying them overhead or at grade separated from through-traffic, eliminating the need for large-radius horizontal curves and associated weaving patterns while maintaining continuous traffic flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS8950970B2Double crossover merging interchange
Publication Date: 2015.02.10 GINGRICH SR MICHAEL A
  • US8950970B2 patent drawing
  • US8950970B2 patent drawing
  • US8950970B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A crossover for travel paths is provided. The crossover includes a primary travel path having a first pathway arranged for travel in a first direction and a second pathway arranged for travel in a second direction, and a secondary travel path having a third pathway arranged for travel in a third direction and a fourth pathway arranged for travel in a fourth direction. A main bridge crossover is provided so that the first and second pathways cross each of the third and fourth pathways without intersecting at grade. Two minor bridge crossovers are provided, each constructed and arranged so that the third and fourth pathways cross each other without intersecting, at grade. Lane communication is provided between select exits and entrances to minimize weaving traffic patterns, additional flyovers are minimized and no 270-degree loops are required, providing continuous traffic flow.