Double Descent Training for Time Series Forecasting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current deep learning models for time series forecasting are undertrained, leading to suboptimal performance, as they do not leverage the 'double descent' phenomenon, which suggests that increased model complexity and training epochs can improve generalization performance beyond initial overfitting.

Innovation Solution

A 'modern regime' training framework for deep learning-based time series forecasting models is introduced, which increases model complexity and extends training epochs beyond conventional limits, allowing the model to experience a 'double descent' by initially improving, then deteriorating, and finally exceeding the initial performance maximum.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If model complexity and training epochs are increased, then generalization performance can exceed initial local maximum, but training time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeneralization performanceVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The method proactively extends training beyond the point where validation performance first deteriorates, anticipating the double descent phenomenon. By pre-planning to train through the overfitting phase and into the second descent, the system prepares for improved generalization performance before it naturally occurs, rather than stopping at the first sign of validation loss increase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The method changes the training parameter (number of epochs) from the conventional stopping point to a point beyond the first validation maximum. This parameter change allows the model to traverse the double descent curve and reach the second, lower validation loss region, thereby improving generalization performance despite increased training time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If training epochs are extended beyond initial performance maximum, then performance can exceed local maximum, but risk of overfitting increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeneralization performanceVSAvoidoverfitting
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The method converts the harmful effect of overfitting (validation loss increase) into a beneficial outcome. By intentionally allowing training to continue through the overfitting phase, the system exploits the double descent phenomenon where the model eventually generalizes better than at the first maximum, transforming what was traditionally seen as a harmful overfitting region into a productive training zone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The system proactively anticipates and prepares for the double descent phenomenon by extending training epochs before validation performance deteriorates. This preliminary action allows the model to naturally traverse the overfitting region and reach the second descent, converting the potential harm of overfitting into the benefit of improved generalization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If model complexity is increased, then capacity to learn complex patterns improves, but computational resources and training time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel capacityVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The method changes the training parameter (number of epochs) rather than increasing model architecture complexity. By extending training time, the existing model capacity is fully utilized to achieve better generalization, avoiding the need for more complex models with additional parameters or layers, thereby managing computational resources more efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250053795A1Double descent for time series forecasting
Publication Date: 2025.02.13 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US20250053795A1 patent drawing
  • US20250053795A1 patent drawing
  • US20250053795A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A “modern regime” training framework for deep learning-based time series forecasting models is described herein. In summary, the “modern regime” training framework consists of configuring the hyperparameters of the training process in a manner that substantially increases the complexity of the time series forecasting model beyond conventional norms and enables the time series forecasting model to achieve a “double descent” during the training process. In essence, a “double descent” has occurred when, after initially improving and reaching a local maximum performance, the performance of the time series forecasting model is allowed to deteriorate substantially and then improve again to reach a performance that exceeds the initial local maximum performance.