Device for coordinated control and operation of double doors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional mechanisms for controlling double doors are large, complex, and require many moving parts, leading to high wear and obstruction when fully open, and lack the ability for coordinated sequencing of door closure or opening.

Innovation Solution

A device with a plate connected to a linear motion facilitator and adjustable links that allows both doors to be opened or closed with one hand, featuring proper geometry to reduce stress on doors and hinges, and a low profile design that does not obstruct access when fully open.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If conventional mechanisms are used to control double doors, then door operation is achieved, but the device becomes large, bulky, and obstructs access when doors are fully open

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor operationVSAvoiddevice size
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent repositions the control mechanism from a side-mounted conventional location to the top surface of the cabinet. This dimensional change allows the mechanism to have a low profile that does not obstruct access when doors are fully open, while still providing full door operation capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of mounting the mechanism on the side of the cabinet where it would protrude and obstruct access, the patent inverts the mounting approach by placing it on the top surface. This inversion eliminates the obstruction problem while maintaining operational functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Ease of operation

If conventional mechanisms with many moving parts are used, then door control is achieved, but wear increases and reliability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor controlVSAvoidwear resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates unnecessary moving parts from the conventional mechanism. By using a simplified design with fewer components, the patent reduces wear points while maintaining the essential door control function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanism is designed to be self-contained with integrated components that reduce the need for separate moving parts. The low-profile design inherently reduces wear by minimizing contact points and simplifying the mechanical linkage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If conventional mechanisms are used, then door operation is achieved, but the device becomes complex with many parts requiring replacement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor operationVSAvoidnumber of parts
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the door control function into essential components only, eliminating non-essential parts. This segmentation approach simplifies the overall device while maintaining operational capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanism is designed to perform multiple functions with a single integrated structure, reducing the total number of parts. The universal design handles both door operations without requiring separate specialized components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Ease of operation

If conventional mechanisms are used, then door control is achieved, but sequencing of door closure or opening is not possible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor controlVSAvoidsequencing capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates adjustable links that can be configured to provide different motion sequences. This dynamic adjustability allows the mechanism to sequence door opening and closing operations while maintaining ease of operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanism is designed to perform preliminary positioning and sequencing actions through its adjustable linkage system, enabling coordinated door operations before the actual opening or closing occurs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10669769B2Device for coordinated control and operation of double doors
Publication Date: 2020.06.02 L&L CDC LLC
  • US10669769B2 patent drawing
  • US10669769B2 patent drawing
  • US10669769B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device for coordinated control and operation of double doors having a plate with a rectilinear motion that is associated with links with adjustable lengths that connect the plate to the double doors, with both the first and the second doors opened when one of the doors is opened and sequentially closed when one of the doors is closed.