Double-Door Cooling Mechanism With Reduced Door Gap

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In cooling devices with two side-by-side doors, the overlapping door opening mechanisms create a gap between the doors, compromising insulation effectiveness and aesthetics.

Innovation Solution

The door opening mechanisms are designed with handles at the same height and support members positioned differently, allowing the handles to rotate in a way that reduces the gap between the doors, utilizing a cam shaft and transmission member to facilitate easy door separation while maintaining insulation and aesthetics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If door opening mechanisms are secured on the side wall of the door, then the door can be easily opened, but the mechanisms overlap and cause a gap to be formed between the two doors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor openingVSAvoidgap between doors
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The support members are positioned at different heights (vertical dimension) rather than at the same location, allowing the door opening mechanisms to be staggered vertically. This dimensional change eliminates the overlap that causes the gap while maintaining the ease of door opening function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The door opening mechanisms are configured asymmetrically with respect to vertical positioning - one mechanism is higher than the other. This asymmetric arrangement allows both mechanisms to coexist on adjacent doors without overlapping, thereby eliminating the gap formation while preserving operational ease.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Ease of operation

If door opening mechanisms are secured on the side wall of the door, then the door can be easily opened, but the insulation effectiveness of the interior air decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor openingVSAvoidinsulation effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

By positioning support members at different heights, the door opening mechanisms are staggered vertically, eliminating the gap between doors. This reduces air leakage and improves insulation effectiveness while maintaining ease of door opening.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The asymmetric vertical positioning of support members eliminates the overlapping region that would create a gap, thereby reducing energy loss through the door junction while preserving the door opening function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Shape

If the handles are positioned to minimize the gap between doors, then the appearance is improved, but the door opening mechanism becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegap between doorsVSAvoiddoor opening mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of adjusting handle shapes or positions extensively, the solution uses vertical positioning of support members at different heights. This simpler dimensional adjustment achieves gap reduction without requiring complex handle designs or additional mechanism components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS9316429B2Cooling device comprising a door opening mechanism
Publication Date: 2016.04.19 ARCELIK AS
  • US9316429B2 patent drawing
  • US9316429B2 patent drawing
  • US9316429B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A cooling device (1) is described that includes a body (2) wherein the objects to be cooled are placed, two doors (3) providing access into the body (2) and which remain side by side when closed, two door opening mechanisms (4), each situated on one door (3) and wherein the distance between the doors (3) is decreased.