Double Dump Valve Prevents Backflow in Additive Manufacturing Recycler

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current powder recyclers in additive manufacturing discard smaller particles below 50 microns, leading to waste and diminished process performance, and the combination of helical cyclones with original dump valves causes backflow issues preventing powder from recycling.

Innovation Solution

A powder system recycler design incorporating a helical cyclone with a two-valve system that alternately opens and closes to prevent backflow, allowing for the recycling of a wider range of particle sizes down to 3 microns, effectively recycling almost all powder without discarding smaller particles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single dump valve is used in the recycler system, then the structure is simple, but backflow occurs preventing powder from falling into the trough

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve system structureVSAvoidpowder flow reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The single dump valve is segmented into two separate valves (first dump valve and second dump valve) that operate alternately. This segmentation prevents backflow by ensuring one valve is closed when the other opens, while maintaining the function of powder discharge into the trough.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The two dump valves operate in a periodic alternating manner, with each valve opening and closing in sequence. This periodic action ensures continuous powder flow while preventing backflow, as one valve is always closed to block reverse flow while the other opens for discharge.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Device complexity

If the cutoff point is set at 50 microns, then the recycler operates simply, but smaller particles are discarded causing waste and diminished process performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecycler operationVSAvoidpowder waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The cutoff point parameter is changed from 50 microns to 3 microns by modifying the recycler system. This parameter change allows the system to retain and recycle smaller particles that were previously discarded, reducing powder waste and improving process performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If the cutoff point is extended to 3 microns, then powder recycling efficiency is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepowder recycling efficiencyVSAvoidrecycler system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The recycler system is segmented into multiple functional components including a first recycler with a first dump valve and a second recycler with a second dump valve. This segmentation enables the system to handle a wider particle size range (down to 3 microns) while managing complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates dynamic control of multiple valves that open and close in sequence based on operational requirements. This dynamic operation allows the system to maintain high recycling efficiency for particles down to 3 microns while managing system complexity through automated valve control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution significantly improves the recycling efficiency by extending the cutoff point from 50 microns to 3 microns, minimizing waste and enhancing the performance of the additive manufacturing process by retaining smaller particles, thus improving the adherence of powder to substrate sheets.

Implementation Method 1

a helical cyclone for retaining the smaller particles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Implementation Method 2

a two-valve (gate or flap) system that alternately open and close to release powder into a trough

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBackflow prevention: Valve

Data Source

PatentUS11667081B2Double dump valve
Publication Date: 2023.06.06 IMPOSSIBLE OBJECTS INC
  • US11667081B2 patent drawing
  • US11667081B2 patent drawing
  • US11667081B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A double dump valve apparatus has the doors flap open in opposite horizontal orientations and directions.