Double-Effect Liquid Desiccant Dehumidification for Humidity Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current HVAC systems face challenges in efficiently handling humidity levels, leading to poor Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) and high energy consumption, particularly in hot and humid climates, due to the limitations of vapor compression systems in managing latent and sensible heat loads separately.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a double-effect liquid desiccant dehumidification system (LDDS) that uses ionic liquids as the desiccant, incorporating a high desorber and low desorber configuration with heat exchangers to efficiently remove moisture from air and regenerate the desiccant solution, allowing for separate handling of sensible and latent heat loads.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If vapor compression systems are used for cooling, then cooling capacity is achieved, but energy consumption increases and humidity control deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidhumidity control
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the thermal load into two independent parts: a liquid desiccant dehumidification system that handles latent heat (moisture removal) and a conventional vapor compression system that handles sensible heat (temperature control). This segmentation allows each subsystem to optimize its function, with the desiccant system removing moisture without cooling and the vapor compression system providing temperature control, thereby improving overall energy efficiency and humidity control independence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If liquid desiccant dehumidification is implemented, then humidity control improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehumidity controlVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the liquid desiccant dehumidification system with the conventional vapor compression cooling system into a hybrid HVAC system. The desiccant system handles moisture removal while the vapor compression system handles temperature control, and the two systems are integrated through shared components and coordinated operation. This merging approach manages complexity by using established technologies in complementary roles rather than replacing the entire system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Power

If high GWP refrigerants are used, then cooling performance is maintained, but environmental impact increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling performanceVSAvoidenvironmental impact
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the operating parameters and working substances by introducing liquid desiccant (such as ionic liquids or salt solutions) as the primary dehumidification medium. This parameter change eliminates or reduces the need for high GWP refrigerants in the dehumidification function, using instead environmentally friendly liquid desiccants that can be regenerated thermally. The vapor compression system retains its refrigerant for sensible cooling only, thereby reducing overall refrigerant quantity and environmental impact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly enhances energy efficiency, reduces system complexity and cost, and improves IAQ by enabling independent control of humidity and temperature levels, while also reducing the reliance on high global warming potential refrigerants.

Implementation Method 1

a high desorber configured to heat the working solution to evaporate water

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Implementation Method 2

configured with the low desorber for condensation of water evaporated from a working solution within the high desorber in a condenser

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCondensation: Condensation

Implementation Method 3

The working solution from the low desorber is configured with the absorber for condensation of water from ambient air into the working solution within a working solution conduit of the absorber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbsorption: Absorption (physical)

Implementation Method 4

The double-effect LDDS can have a low heat exchanger thermally coupling portions of the working solution

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat exchange: Heat Exchanger

Data Source

PatentUS11123682B2Liquid desiccant based dehumidification and cooling system
Publication Date: 2021.09.21 UNIV OF FLORIDA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
  • US11123682B2 patent drawing
  • US11123682B2 patent drawing
  • US11123682B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A liquid desiccant system including a high desorber, a low desorber, and an absorber that are in fluid communication with a working solution, where the high desorber provides rejected water vapor from the working fluid for condensation in a condenser of the low desorber that provides heat for rejection of additional water from the working solution in the low desorber effectively multiplying the heat provided for desorption. The low desorber provided the concentrated working solution to the absorber where water from ambient air is condensed into the concentrated working solution to provide a dilute working solution within a working solution conduit of the absorber that is thermally coupled to an internal cooler of the absorber. In some embodiments, the working solution can be an aqueous solution of at least one ionic liquid.