Double-Flap Saddle Underflaps for Rider-Horse Shape Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional saddles for horse riding fail to effectively adapt to the needs of the rider and the shape of the horse, leading to suboptimal comfort and reliability, while being costly.

Innovation Solution

A saddle design featuring double-flap underflaps with varying thicknesses and materials, including a cushioning structure and panel structure with specific Shore hardness values, integrated with a sheet-like leather body and expanded polyurethane padding, to enhance comfort and reliability without significantly increasing production costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional cushions are used in saddles, then the saddle structure is simple, but the comfort and adaptability to rider and horse shape are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to rider and horse shapeVSAvoidsaddle structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The underflap is divided into multiple zones with different padding densities and firmness levels. The panel structure includes regions with varying Shore hardness values (5-25 for panel, 40-60 for cushioning structure) to provide localized support and comfort in different areas, allowing the saddle to adapt to the rider's body shape and the horse's contours without requiring a completely complex reconfigurable structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The underflap combines multiple materials with different properties: expanded polyurethane foam for the cushioning structure (Shore hardness 40-60) and panel structure (Shore hardness 5-25), along with sheet-like leather body material. This composite construction provides both comfort and structural integrity while maintaining adaptability to different shapes without excessive complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Ease of operation

If conventional uniform-thickness leather bodies are used, then the manufacturing process is simple, but the comfort and pressure distribution are suboptimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomfort during useVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The sheet-like leather body features varying thicknesses in different regions: the lower portion has a first thickness (A) and the upper portion has a second thickness (B) which is thinner than A. This thickness variation is strategically positioned to provide pressure distribution and comfort in specific areas while maintaining ease of manufacture through controlled variation rather than complete redesign

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of operation

If additional padding layers are added to increase comfort, then the comfort is improved, but the manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomfort during useVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The underflap uses expanded polyurethane foam as a cost-effective composite material that provides excellent cushioning and comfort properties. The foam is used in specific configurations (cushioning structure and panel structure) to maximize comfort while controlling manufacturing costs, avoiding the need for expensive traditional padding materials

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The padding is configured with specific Shore hardness values (5-25 for panel structure, 40-60 for cushioning structure) to optimize comfort performance. By carefully selecting and controlling these material parameters, the invention achieves high comfort levels without proportionally increasing manufacturing costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP4361090B1Saddle for horse riding
Publication Date: 2025.07.23 PRESTIGE ITAL
  • EP4361090B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4361090B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3

AI summary

A saddle for horse riding (1), comprising a supporting frame (2), defining a seat (3) which extends along a longitudinal direction of extension (100) of the saddle (1), and at least one first and one second flap (4), which are associated with the supporting frame (2) and are arranged on opposite sides with respect to a plane of symmetry which is vertical in use and passes through the longitudinal direction of extension (100), the saddle for horse riding (1) comprising a double-flap saddle provided with a first and a second underflap (10) arranged between a respective flap (4) and the back (200) of the horse, wherein the first and the second underflap (10) are provided with a respective padding and a sheet-like leather body (40) which has a lower portion (41) extending below the padding and an upper portion (42) arranged at least partially facing the padding.