Double-Grip Putter With Canted Aim Lines for Face Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional single-grip putters lack adequate control of the putter face throughout the stroke and do not provide a stable connection between the golfer's hands, and they fail to compensate for ball roll line deviation due to toe-up or toe-down putting.

Innovation Solution

A double grip putter with tapered grips and a canted aim line system that includes three-point gripping for a 'feel triangle' and marked aim lines to stabilize hand positioning and compensate for ball roll deviations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single grip is used on conventional putters, then the device complexity is reduced, but the control of the putter face and stability of hand connection deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrip structureVSAvoidputter face control
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The single grip is segmented into two separate grips (upper grip and lower grip) positioned at different locations on the shaft. This segmentation allows independent control points for the hands, improving putter face control and stability during the putting stroke while maintaining a relatively simple overall structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If different grips are used for upper and lower hands, then ease of operation is improved, but the feel consistency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehand positioningVSAvoidfeel consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The upper grip and lower grip are designed with different characteristics suited to their specific locations and functions. The upper grip has a larger diameter for thumb placement and control, while the lower grip has a smaller diameter for finger placement. This local differentiation optimizes hand positioning and control while the consistent material and texture maintain uniform feel across both grips.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Device complexity

If conventional aim lines are used, then the device complexity is reduced, but the accuracy of aiming compensation for toe-up or toe-down putting deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaiming systemVSAvoidaiming accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The aim lines are designed with asymmetric cant angles relative to the putter shaft axis. Different aim lines have different cant angles to compensate for the asymmetric effects of toe-up and toe-down putting positions. This asymmetric design allows accurate aiming compensation for various putting styles while maintaining a simple visual aiming system without complex mechanical components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Data Source

PatentUS12377328B2Golf putter
Publication Date: 2025.08.05 HEILMAN BRAD
  • US12377328B2 patent drawing
  • US12377328B2 patent drawing
  • US12377328B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A conventional length golf putter a first grip attached to the end of the shaft and a second grip attached to the shaft spaced from and below the first grip. The grips have matching frustoconical portions to create similar feel. The putter has a head with an alignment system to accommodate heel and toe putts.