Double Locking Safety Snap Hook Prevents Accidental Opening

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional safety snap hooks are prone to opening due to inadvertent or undesired contact, compromising user safety and reliability.

Innovation Solution

A double locking safety snap hook design featuring a pivotable gate, a trigger, and a locking member, where both free ends of the trigger and locking member must be intentionally rotated to release the gate, ensuring the hook throat opening can only be opened intentionally.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a conventional single-trigger gate mechanism is used, then the device complexity is low, but the reliability is reduced due to accidental opening

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The gate releasing mechanism is segmented into two independent locking systems: a first locking member (ball detent) that engages with a first locking groove, and a second locking member (latch) that engages with a second locking groove. Both must be disengaged simultaneously to open the gate, preventing accidental opening while maintaining manageable complexity through modular design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The trigger mechanism performs preliminary actions by sequentially disengaging both locking members before the gate can open. The trigger first releases the ball detent from the first locking groove, then releases the latch from the second locking groove, ensuring that accidental single-contact opening is prevented while maintaining a controlled opening sequence

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If a double locking mechanism with trigger and locking member is implemented, then the reliability is improved by preventing accidental opening, but the ease of operation is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The trigger mechanism merges the function of disengaging both locking members (ball detent and latch) into a single integrated component. When the trigger is pulled, it simultaneously releases both locking mechanisms through connected linkages, maintaining ease of operation despite the dual-locking complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The trigger acts as an intermediary that mediates between the user's single pulling action and the complex dual-locking release requirement. The trigger transmits force through linkages to sequentially disengage both locking members, allowing simple user operation while maintaining reliable dual-locking security

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS9032595B2Double locking safety snap hook
Publication Date: 2015.05.19 USANG INDAL
  • US9032595B2 patent drawing
  • US9032595B2 patent drawing
  • US9032595B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A safety snap hook includes a body defining a hook throat opening, a pivotable gate biased to close the hook throat opening, a pivotable trigger extending through an aperture in the gate and biased to press against a locking surface of the gate, and a pivotable locking member biased to a locking position whereat rotation of the gate relative to the body is prevented. When free ends of the trigger and the locking member are rotated toward the body to remove the trigger from the locking surface and rotate the locking member to a release position, the gate can be rotated relative to the body to open the hook throat opening.