Double-Lumen Endotracheal Tube for CO2 Removal

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional mechanical ventilators with single lumen endotracheal tubes and respiratory circuits introduce significant dead space, hindering CO2 removal and increasing arterial CO2 levels due to rebreathing of expired air, which complicates respiratory support for patients with impaired respiratory function.

Innovation Solution

A patient-synchronized ventilatory assist system with a double-lumen endotracheal tube and pressure control system that regulates airflow through inspiratory and expiratory lumens based on physiological breathing signals, ensuring unidirectional airflow to minimize dead space and prevent CO2 rebreathing by allowing unrestricted airflow during expiration and partially restricting airflow during inspiration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single lumen endotracheal tube is used in conventional mechanical ventilators, then the device structure is simple, but dead space ventilation increases and CO2 removal is hampered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetube structureVSAvoidCO2 removal efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The endotracheal tube is divided into multiple lumens (at least two lumens: first lumen for inspiration, second lumen for expiration) to separate the airflow paths. This segmentation eliminates dead space ventilation by ensuring that expired air does not mix with inspired air, thereby optimizing CO2 removal while maintaining manageable device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A third lumen is introduced as an intermediary flow path that connects to the subglottic space. This intermediary lumen actively removes CO2-rich air from the trachea during inspiration, preventing its rebreathing and enhancing CO2 removal efficiency without requiring complete redesign of the basic tube structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If multi-lumen designs with parallel lumens are used to improve CO2 removal, then CO2 removal is reduced, but the volume of re-breathed air is not completely eliminated and dynamic hyperinflation problems occur

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCO2 removalVSAvoidbreathing safety
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs dynamic flow control where the third lumen is activated specifically during the inspiratory phase to remove CO2 from the subglottic space, while the first and second lumens maintain their primary inspiration and expiration functions. This dynamic, phase-specific operation eliminates re-breathing without causing dynamic hyperinflation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The third lumen operates periodically during the inspiratory phase only, synchronized with the breathing cycle. This periodic activation removes CO2 at the appropriate time without creating continuous flow that would lead to dynamic hyperinflation, thereby ensuring breathing safety while improving CO2 removal

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Productivity

If tube lumens with valve functions are used to control airflow, then CO2 removal is improved, but the risk of occlusion increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCO2 removalVSAvoidflow continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The complex valve control mechanisms from prior art are extracted and replaced with a simpler passive flow direction system using unidirectional valves at the distal end of each lumen. This extraction of complexity maintains CO2 removal effectiveness while eliminating the high risk of occlusion associated with active valve functions within the tube lumens

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Reliability

If tidal volume and ventilation are increased to maintain tolerable arterial CO2 levels, then PaCO2 is controlled, but the metabolic load and respiratory drive increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovePaCO2 controlVSAvoidmetabolic load
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system converts the harmful effect of dead space ventilation into a beneficial active CO2 removal mechanism. By using the third lumen to actively suction CO2 from the subglottic space during inspiration, the system eliminates the need to increase tidal volume and ventilation to compensate for dead space, thereby controlling PaCO2 without increasing metabolic load

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces respiratory drive, tidal volumes, and ventilation, optimizing CO2 removal and reducing metabolic load by minimizing dead space and preventing air from being rebreathed, thus enhancing the efficiency of mechanical ventilation.

Implementation Method 1

a pressure controller responsive to a physiological breathing signal representative of patient's inspiratory effort. Based on the physiological breathing signal, the pressure controller allows an unrestricted air flow through the expiratory tube lumen during a patient's expiration phase and partially restricts the air flow through the expiratory tube lumen to a minimum air flow during a patient's inspiration phase

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure control: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

During both the patient's inspiration and expiration phases, a unidirectional air flow is produced through the inspiratory tube lumen and the expiratory tube lumen to prevent air expired by the patient from being breathed again

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectUnidirectional flow: Valve

Data Source

PatentEP2588177B1System for patient-synchronized ventilatory assist with endotracheal through-flow
Publication Date: 2020.01.01 ST MICHAELS HOSPITAL
  • EP2588177B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2588177B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2588177B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A ventilatory assist system and method are disclosed. The system comprises a tube for connection to a patient's airway, inspiratory and expiratory tube lumens connected to the tube, an inspiratory air source connected to the inspiration tube lumen, and a controller of air pressure in the expiratory tube lumen. The pressure controller is responsive to a physiological breathing signal representative of patient's inspiratory effort to allow air flow through the expiratory tube lumen during a patient's expiration phase, partially restricting the air flow through the expiratory tube lumen to a minimum air flow during a patient's inspiration phase. During both respiratory phases, a unidirectional air flow is produced through the inspiratory and expiratory tube lumens to prevent air expired by the patient from being breathed again. The physiological breathing signal allows synchronization of the ventilatory assist with breathing efforts of the patient.