Double-Null-Steering Beamforming for IBOC Adjacent Interference

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In-band on-channel (IBOC) radio transmission systems face interference issues due to digital sidebands, which affect the reception of digital radio and analog radio broadcast signals transmitted simultaneously on the same frequency, leading to increased interference and reduced signal quality.

Innovation Solution

The method involves selecting time samples from multiple antennas, generating and filtering signals to calculate weighting coefficients that maximize the Signal-to-Interference-plus-Noise-Ratio (SINR), and combining these coefficients with filtered signals to reduce first adjacent interference, using a digital adaptive beam-former and finite impulse response (FIR) filters for improved signal reception.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If digital sidebands are used to transmit digital information in IBOC system, then digital radio transmission is enabled, but interference is increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedigital radio transmission capabilityVSAvoidinterference
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the signal processing into three distinct frequency bands (lower sideband, middle band, upper sideband) and applies separate beamforming weight calculations to each band. This allows independent optimization of interference suppression in each band while maintaining digital transmission capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different beamforming weight coefficients to different frequency bands rather than a uniform approach. Specifically, it calculates separate weight coefficients for lower, middle, and upper bands, allowing each band to be optimized for its specific interference characteristics while maintaining overall system performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Object-affected harmful factors

If beam forming with double-null-steering is applied, then adjacent interference is suppressed, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadjacent interferenceVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the beamforming computation into three separate weight coefficient calculations for lower, middle, and upper bands. Each calculation focuses on a specific frequency range, reducing the computational burden compared to a full-band approach while achieving effective interference suppression.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies beamforming weight coefficients selectively to specific frequency bands rather than processing the entire spectrum uniformly. This partial action approach concentrates computational resources on the bands where interference is most problematic, achieving effective suppression with reduced overall complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9838100B2Beam forming with double-null-steering for in-band on-channel reception
Publication Date: 2017.12.05 NXP BV
  • US9838100B2 patent drawing
  • US9838100B2 patent drawing
  • US9838100B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various exemplary embodiments relate to a method for improving reception of transmissions with first adjacent interference signals, the method including selecting one or more time samples from each of two or more antennas; generating a lower first adjacent interference (LFAI) signal, a desired signal, and an upper first adjacent interference (UFAI) signal for each of the time samples; calculating a lower weighting co-efficient based on the LFAI signal; calculating a middle weighting co-efficient based on the desired signal; calculating a upper weighting co-efficient based on the UFAI signal; combining the lower weighting co-efficient with a filtered LFAI signal into a weighted lower signal; combining the middle weighting co-efficient with a filtered desired signal into a weighted middle signal; combining the upper weighting co-efficient with a filtered UFAI signal into a weighted upper signal; and combining the weighted lower signal, the weighted middle signal, and the weighted upper signal.