Double Pipe Bend Snap-Fit Assembly

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing double pipe bend systems require tools for assembly, increasing working time and dependency on skilled labor, and may not provide a simple visual check for proper assembly.

Innovation Solution

A snap-in connection system with radially extending fixing webs and insertion pockets allows for tool-free assembly, featuring U-shaped pockets and hook-shaped extensions for secure engagement, along with support projections and guide extensions for stability and alignment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If screws and tools are used to assemble the double pipe bend system, then a secure connection is achieved, but assembly time increases and skilled labor is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection securityVSAvoidassembly time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The connection system is segmented into distinct components: fixing webs attached to the outer pipe bend and corresponding insertion pockets on the inner pipe bend. This segmentation allows for simplified assembly where components interlock without requiring complex tools or skilled labor, while maintaining secure connection through the distributed fixing web structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The snap-in connection system is designed to be self-assembling without external tools. The fixing webs automatically engage with the insertion pockets through a snap-in mechanism that provides both guidance and securing force, eliminating the need for screwdrivers, wrenches, or other assembly tools while maintaining reliable connection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Manufacturing precision

If screws are used to connect the pipe bends, then a form-fitting connection is achieved, but the assembly process becomes complex and requires skilled labor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveform-fitting connectionVSAvoidassembly simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using threaded fasteners that require threading and tightening operations, the invention inverts the approach by using a snap-in mechanism where the fixing webs are inserted into the insertion pockets and locked in place through elastic engagement. This inversion simplifies the assembly process from complex screw fastening to simple insertion and locking, while maintaining precise form-fitting connection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanical screw and thread system is replaced with a snap-in elastic engagement system. The fixing webs utilize elastic deformation and geometric interlocking to achieve form-fitting connection, substituting the complex screw-thread-mechanism with a simpler elastic snap-in mechanism that requires no specialized skills or tools

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If a simple snap-in connection is used, then assembly is simplified and tool-free, but connection strength may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly simplicityVSAvoidconnection strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple fixing webs are merged into a single connection system, distributing the connection strength across multiple engagement points. Each fixing web provides individual snap-in engagement, and the combined effect of multiple webs creates a strong, reliable connection that maintains structural integrity while preserving assembly simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The connection strength is enhanced by adding dimensional complexity to the fixing web structure. The fixing webs extend in multiple directions and engage with corresponding features in the insertion pockets, creating a multi-dimensional interlocking system that provides strong connection resistance in various load directions while maintaining simple snap-in assembly

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentEP3217060B1Double tube sheet system
Publication Date: 2018.10.24 CENTTHERM SYSTTECHN GMBH
  • EP3217060B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3217060B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3217060B1 patent drawingFigure 5~7

AI summary

In a double pipe bend system (1; 101) with an outer pipe bend (2; 102) and an inner pipe bend (3; 103) surrounded by the outer pipe bend (2; 102), which are connected to each other via a positive locking connection (20), a solution is to be created by which an improved double pipe bend system is provided which can be easily and quickly assembled without tools.This is achieved by the positive locking connection (20) being a snap-fit ​​connection (21) comprising at least two fixing ribs (22a, 22b, 23a, 23b; 122a, 122b) extending radially from the inside (24) of the outer tube bend (2; 102) and at least in the direction of the first longitudinal axis (12), and at least two insertion pockets (25a, 25b; 125a, 125b) extending radially from the outside (26) of the inner tube bend (3; 103) and at least in the direction of the first longitudinal axis (12), wherein each fixing rib (22a, 22b, 23a, 23b; 122a, 122b) is inserted into and connected to an associated insertion pocket (25a, 25b; 125a, 125b). is in a form-fitting engagement.