Double-Row One-Way Bearing Cage for Faster Reverse Locking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional one-way bearings have a complicated structure, inconvenient installation, poor lubrication and sealing, significant cage thickness occupying internal space, limited sealing options, and delayed reverse locking, with insufficient radial and axial force bearing capacity.

Innovation Solution

A double-row one-way bearing design featuring a cage with independent roller and wedge holding portions, an elastic limit ring to stabilize wedges, and a simplified structure that allows for thinner cages and increased wedge count, enabling easier assembly and improved locking performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If wedge holding springs are installed near each wedge pocket to abut against the wedges, then the wedges can be stabilized in position, but the cage structure becomes complicated and installation becomes time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewedge position stabilityVSAvoidcage structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple wedge holding springs into a single continuous spring structure that spans across multiple wedge pockets, eliminating the need for individual springs at each pocket. This merging approach maintains wedge stabilization while dramatically simplifying the cage structure and reducing installation complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The single continuous spring structure serves multiple functions simultaneously: it stabilizes multiple wedges along its length, provides uniform elastic force distribution, and simplifies the cage design. This multi-functional element replaces what would otherwise require multiple separate spring components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Strength

If the cage is made thick enough to accommodate wedge holding springs and maintain structural integrity, then the cage can support the wedges, but it occupies most of the inner space of the bearing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecage structural strengthVSAvoidcage thickness
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

By merging multiple spring elements into a single continuous spring, the overall volume required for spring accommodation is reduced, allowing for a thinner cage design that maintains sufficient structural strength while occupying less internal bearing space

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The continuous spring structure acts as a flexible element that can provide the necessary structural support and wedge retention functionality with minimal thickness, enabling the cage to be made thinner while maintaining adequate strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

3Stability of the object's composition

If the cage occupies most of the inner space of the bearing, then the wedges can be retained, but lubrication and sealing options are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewedge retentionVSAvoidsealing and lubrication options
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The consolidated spring structure reduces the overall space occupied by retention mechanisms, creating additional internal clearance that accommodates various sealing and lubrication configurations without compromising wedge retention capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Stability of the object's composition

If multiple individual wedge holding springs are used for each wedge, then each wedge can be independently stabilized, but the installation process becomes very complicated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindividual wedge stabilizationVSAvoidinstallation convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple individual spring installations into a single continuous spring placement operation. This allows all wedges to be stabilized simultaneously through one installation action rather than requiring separate spring installations for each wedge, dramatically improving installation convenience

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design simplifies cage structure, reduces thickness, enhances sealing and lubrication options, and improves axial and radial force bearing capacity while reducing reverse locking delay.

Implementation Method 1

an elastic limit ring coaxially arranged with the bearing outer ring and the bearing inner ring, and passes through the groove of each wedge to apply a radially inward force to each wedge

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS12416335B2Double-row one-way bearing
Publication Date: 2025.09.16 AB SKF SKF PATENT DEPARTMENT
  • US12416335B2 patent drawing
  • US12416335B2 patent drawing
  • US12416335B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A double-row one-way bearing includes a bearing outer ring and a bearing inner ring coaxially arranged around a central axis. Spherical rollers are arranged between the bearing outer ring and the bearing inner ring. Wedges are radially arranged between the bearing outer ring and the bearing inner ring relative to the central axis, and spaced apart from the spherical rollers in the axial direction. Each wedge is provided with a groove at the side away from the bearing inner ring. A cage is coaxially arranged with the bearing outer ring and the bearing inner ring and provided with roller holding portions and wedge holding portions. The spherical rollers are respectively held in the roller holding portions and the wedges are respectively held in the wedge holding portions. An elastic limit ring passes through the groove of each wedge to apply a radially inward force to each wedge.