Double-Sided Bead Board Design Versatility

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing bead boards are limited to holding beads on a single side, restricting the variety of designs that can be created.

Innovation Solution

A double-sided bead board with recessed designs on both sides, allowing for greater design versatility, made from materials like metal, plastic, or wood, and optionally featuring handles, a lid, and measurement markings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a bead board is designed with patterns on both sides, then design versatility is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign versatilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The bead board transitions from a single-sided design to a double-sided design by utilizing the third dimension (depth/thickness of the board). This allows patterns to be formed on both the front and back surfaces, effectively doubling the design capacity without adding separate board structures. The recessed design sections are formed by removing material from the board body, creating depth that accommodates bead patterns on both sides.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The bead board is designed to serve multiple functions by accommodating bead patterns on both sides simultaneously. The same board structure serves as a working surface for designs on the front side and a storage/working surface for designs on the back side. The recessed sections on both sides provide universal functionality for holding beads in patterned arrangements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If recessed design sections are formed by removing material, then design flexibility is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign flexibilityVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The manufacturing approach changes from adding material structures to removing material. By defining the recessed design sections as void spaces within the board body rather than added features, the design flexibility is maximized while the manufacturing process becomes more straightforward. The board can be manufactured as a solid piece with specific regions removed to create the recessed patterns, simplifying the overall manufacturing compared to constructing complex three-dimensional structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11975562B1Bead board having two sides
Publication Date: 2024.05.07 WEST CAM
  • US11975562B1 patent drawing
  • US11975562B1 patent drawing
  • US11975562B1 patent drawing

AI summary

According to an aspect of the present invention, a double-sided bead board, comprising: a base; a first pattern of recessed designs on a first side of the base; and a second pattern of recessed designs on a second side of the base.