Double-Sided Polishing for Optical Lenses

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for ultra-precision machining of optical lenses are inefficient due to cumbersome polishing processes that require frequent turning of single optical components, leading to labor-intensive and low-efficiency machining.

Innovation Solution

A double-sided polishing method where abrasive tools are arranged on both sides of the lens, with controlled motion trajectories and loading pressures, allowing simultaneous polishing of both lens surfaces to enhance machining efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If single optical component polishing is performed using traditional methods, then the polishing process requires frequent turning of the component, but this leads to labor-intensive operations and low machining efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolishing efficiencyVSAvoidoperation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The invention divides the polishing process into two independent simultaneous operations by placing separate abrasive tools on both sides of the lens. Each abrasive tool independently polishes one surface of the lens at the same time, eliminating the need to turn the lens over and perform sequential polishing operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention combines two polishing operations into a single integrated process. Both surfaces of the lens are polished simultaneously in one setup, merging what were previously separate sequential operations into a concurrent unified process, thereby doubling the effective productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Productivity

If abrasive tools are arranged on both sides of the lens for simultaneous polishing, then machining efficiency is improved, but the device structure becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolishing efficiencyVSAvoiddevice structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses identical abrasive tools on both sides of the lens, making the system universal and adaptable to different lens types (biconvex, biconcave, concave-convex). The same basic apparatus configuration handles multiple lens geometries without requiring specialized equipment for each case.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention tailors the motion trajectory and loading pressure of each abrasive tool to match the specific surface being polished. The control system adjusts parameters locally for each side of the lens based on its curvature and polishing requirements, optimizing the polishing quality for each surface independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Manufacturing precision

If the motion trajectory of abrasive tools is controlled to match surface shapes, then polishing uniformity is improved, but the control system becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolishing uniformityVSAvoidcontrol system
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention employs dynamic control of the abrasive tool motion trajectories, allowing the tools to follow curved paths that match the lens surface geometries. The loading pressures are also dynamically adjusted during the polishing process to maintain uniform material removal rates across different surface regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control system monitors the polishing process and adjusts the motion trajectories and loading pressures of the abrasive tools in real-time based on feedback from sensors. This closed-loop control ensures that the polishing uniformity requirements are met while adapting to variations in lens geometry and material properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method significantly improves the efficiency and uniformity of material removal for optical lenses, reducing the need for frequent turning and labor-intensive processes, while maintaining high precision.

Implementation Method 1

making the abrasive tools close to the upper and lower surfaces of the lens to swing back and forth in the polishing process, producing relative motion and removing the surface materials

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

arranging abrasive tools on upper and lower positions of the lens... removing the surface materials

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbrasion: Abrasion

Data Source

PatentUS12318884B2Double-sided polishing method for optical lens
Publication Date: 2025.06.03 DALIAN UNIV OF TECH
  • US12318884B2 patent drawing
  • US12318884B2 patent drawing
  • US12318884B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A double-sided polishing method for an optical lens belongs to the technical field of ultra-precision machining. In the double-sided polishing method, upper and lower surfaces of the lens are polished simultaneously by arranging abrasive tools on upper and lower positions of the lens, making the abrasive tools close to the upper and lower surfaces of the lens to swing back and forth in the polishing process, producing relative motion and removing the surface materials. In the present invention, in order to eliminate a problem of removal ununiformity, a method for swing machining of abrasive tools and methods for turning over and polishing of workpieces are adopted in a polishing process, which can realize the high efficiency double-sided high-precision machining for a nonplanar lens, and the method can be applied to the double-sided polishing for different types of lenses.