Double Stack Magazine Separator Rod Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional double stack magazines suffer from reduced reliability due to jamming issues, misalignment of cartridges, and slow feeding speeds, especially when exposed to dust or debris, and require additional spring pressure to function effectively.

Innovation Solution

A double stack magazine design featuring a tubular body with a separating rod and a coil spring that maintains two discrete columns of cartridges, preventing rim lock and ensuring proper alignment, along with a follower and spring plate configuration that reduces friction and enhances feeding efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If a double stack magazine design is used to increase capacity, then the magazine capacity is improved, but the reliability deteriorates due to jamming issues and misalignment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagazine capacityVSAvoidfeeding reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The magazine is divided into two separate feed lips (left and right) that independently guide cartridges from separate columns. This segmentation allows each column to feed independently, preventing the jamming issues that occur when cartridges from merged columns interfere with each other during the feeding process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary mechanism in the form of separated feed lips that act as mediators between the two cartridge columns and the chamber. These feed lips prevent direct contact and interference between cartridges from different columns, eliminating the misalignment and jamming problems while maintaining double-stack capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Force

If additional spring pressure is applied to feed cartridges through the taper, then the feeding force is improved, but the device complexity and risk of malfunction increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeeding forceVSAvoidspring pressure mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the problematic magazine taper component that required additional spring pressure. By removing the taper and using parallel feed lips instead, the design reduces the feeding force requirement and eliminates the complexity and malfunction risks associated with high-pressure spring mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Quantity of substance

If a double stack magazine is used to increase capacity, then the magazine capacity is improved, but the susceptibility to misalignment and jamming increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagazine capacityVSAvoidmisalignment and jamming susceptibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The magazine is divided into two separate feed lips (left and right) that independently guide cartridges from separate columns. This segmentation allows each column to feed independently, preventing the jamming issues that occur when cartridges from merged columns interfere with each other during the feeding process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each feed lip is designed with specific local geometry optimized for its designated column, creating localized feeding paths that prevent interference. The left feed lip handles the left column while the right feed lip handles the right column, with each lip's geometry tailored to guide its specific column without affecting the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design significantly increases the magazine's capacity while minimizing jamming risks and maintaining reliability, even when exposed to environmental factors, by ensuring proper cartridge alignment and reducing friction during the feeding process.

Implementation Method 1

a spring within the passage having a first end contacting the floor plate, and having an opposed second end contacting and biasing the follower toward the upper end of the body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

an elongated separator element within the passage

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical separation:

Implementation Method 3

a set of feed lips which stops the vertical motion of the cartridges out of the magazine but allows one cartridge at a time to be pushed forward (stripped) out of the feed lips

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS8776419B2Double stack magazine
Publication Date: 2014.07.15 KEL TEC CNC INDS
  • US8776419B2 patent drawing
  • US8776419B2 patent drawing
  • US8776419B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Double stack magazines have a tubular body defining an elongated passage and a lower and upper end, a floor plate element connected to the lower end, an elongated separator element within the passage, a follower defining an aperture receiving the separator element and movable within the elongated passage, a spring within the passage having a first end contacting the floor plate, and having an opposed second end contacting and biasing the follower toward the upper end of the body. The separator may be a rod spaced apart from the body surfaces. The spring may be spaced apart from the separator element. The spring may be a coil spring having multiple winds, each encompassing the separator element. The separator element may be medially located in the body. The separator element may be positioned to define first and second stack passages between the left and right side walls and the separator element.