Double-Symmetrical Piggery Layout for Lower Stress and Infection Risk

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Intensive livestock farming of domestic pigs in large housing units leads to increased ammonia formation, spatial constraints, stress, and infection risks, resulting in compromised animal welfare and meat quality, despite higher costs and antibiotic use.

Innovation Solution

A pigsty design with functionally double-symmetrical pen units, shared corridors, height-adjustable barriers, central aisles, outdoor runs, and heat recovery systems, promoting species-specific herd formation and natural behaviors while reducing stress and illness through adaptable environments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If large housing units with high stocking densities are used, then productivity increases, but animal welfare deteriorates due to stress and infection risks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeat production efficiencyVSAvoidanimal welfare
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The housing unit is divided into multiple pens (first pen, second pen, third pen, fourth pen) arranged in a functionally double-symmetrical configuration. Each pen contains a limited number of sows (1-3 sows), creating smaller social groups that reduce stress while maintaining overall productivity. The segmentation allows pigs to form species-specific herds within each pen, improving welfare without sacrificing total output.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Four individual pens are merged into a single pen unit that shares common infrastructure including a central aisle, outdoor run, connecting aisle, and partition walls. This merging reduces overall construction costs and space requirements while maintaining the welfare benefits of smaller group sizes through the double-symmetrical arrangement that facilitates herd formation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Productivity

If intensive livestock farming is implemented, then productivity increases, but harmful factors increase due to ammonia formation and infection risks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeat production efficiencyVSAvoidammonia formation and infection risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the housing into four separate pens with limited sow capacity (1-3 sows per pen), the system reduces ammonia formation per pen and limits the spread of infections. The smaller group sizes decrease overall ammonia generation while the partition walls act as barriers to disease transmission, maintaining productivity through efficient use of space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Partition walls serve as intermediary structures between adjacent pens, providing physical barriers that prevent the spread of infections and ammonia gas. These walls include openings for feeding troughs and piglet barriers, allowing necessary interactions while maintaining separation to reduce harmful factors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If animal welfare standards are improved, then animal welfare increases, but meat costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanimal welfareVSAvoidmeat production cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The partition walls serve multiple functions: they separate pens to reduce stress and infection risk, provide support structures for feeding troughs, and act as screens for privacy. The central aisle and outdoor run serve as shared infrastructure for all four pens, reducing per-pen construction costs while maintaining welfare standards through the double-symmetrical design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Four pens share common infrastructure including the central aisle, outdoor run, connecting aisle, and partition walls. This merging of resources reduces overall construction and operating costs compared to four separate housing units, making welfare-improved farming economically viable while maintaining productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances animal welfare by minimizing stress and illness without antibiotics, maintaining cost-effectiveness, and improving meat quality by fostering species-specific behaviors and efficient resource use.

Implementation Method 1

the piglet barrier is designed like a door threshold with a threshold head that is rounded on at least one side, against which the piglets can slip with their hooves

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRounded surface geometry:

Implementation Method 2

a manure cellar with heat recovery is provided beneath the feeding and toilet areas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat recovery: Heat Exchanger

Implementation Method 3

at least one living area for sows and piglets, at least one piglet nest and at least one feeding and toilet area arranged on a slatted floor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity-driven drainage: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentEP4623679A1Piggery
Publication Date: 2025.10.01 A G STALLTECHN & GENETIK
  • EP4623679A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4623679A1 patent drawing
  • EP4623679A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Described is a pigsty with at least one pen unit (32, 33, 34, 35), the pens (1, 2, 3, 4) of which each have at least one living area (5, 6, 7, 8) for sows and piglets, at least one piglet nest (9, 10, 11, 12), and at least one feeding and toilet area (13, 14, 15, 16) arranged on a slatted floor. Each pen unit (32, 33, 34, 35) has four pens (1, 2, 3, 4) arranged in a functionally double-symmetrical arrangement, with one of the axes of symmetry lying on the center line of a connecting corridor (17), via which the entrances (18, 19, 20, 21) to the pens (1, 2, 3, 4) are connected to one another. The other axis of symmetry runs in an intermediate wall (22) which is formed on both sides of the connecting corridor (17) between the feeding and toilet areas (13, 14, 15, 16) of two pens (1, 3) and (2, 4).