Double Tamper Evidence Cap for Container Bottles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current tamper-proof bottle caps can be easily compromised by counterfeiters using mechanical or thermal methods to remove the cap without breaking the Tamper Evidence Band (TEB), allowing fake products to be inserted without detection.

Innovation Solution

A screw cap design featuring a Tamper Evidence Band (TEB) with dual-level frangible bridges and additional markers that indicate first opening and any prior illicit openings, preventing removal without breaking the TEB, and ensuring visible signs of tampering.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a single-level TEB with break line is used, then the cap can indicate first opening, but it can be easily compromised by counterfeiters using mechanical or thermal methods to remove the cap without breaking the TEB

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetamper evidence reliabilityVSAvoidcap structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The TEB is segmented into two distinct levels: an upper level with frangible connection bridges that break during legitimate opening, and a lower level with additional markers positioned closer to the bottle neck. This segmentation creates multiple independent tamper evidence mechanisms, making it significantly harder for counterfeiters to compromise the system while maintaining visual clarity for consumers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention adds a vertical dimension to the tamper evidence system by positioning markers at two different heights on the TEB. The upper markers indicate first opening, while the lower markers detect illicit removal attempts. This multi-level vertical arrangement transforms a single-plane indication system into a three-dimensional tamper detection mechanism, enhancing reliability without overwhelming complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If additional lower markers are added to the TEB, then illicit opening detection is improved, but the manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveillicit opening detectionVSAvoidcap manufacturing ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The dual-level TEB is integrated into a single molded cap structure, combining the upper and lower marker systems into one unified component. This merging approach allows both tamper evidence functions to be manufactured simultaneously in a single injection molding process, avoiding the need for separate assembly steps and maintaining manufacturing efficiency despite the enhanced detection capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention utilizes variations in the physical parameters of the TEB structure, specifically the vertical positioning and geometric configuration of the frangible bridges and markers. By carefully controlling these geometric parameters during molding, the system achieves enhanced illicit opening detection while maintaining compatibility with standard manufacturing processes and material properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If the frangible bridges are made strong, then the cap can be removed without breaking, but the tamper evidence function is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecap removal easeVSAvoidtamper evidence function
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The frangible connection bridges are pre-designed with controlled weakness at specific stress points, creating a predetermined failure mechanism. During legitimate cap removal, the applied force naturally concentrates on these pre-weakened sections, causing them to break cleanly and indicate opening. This preliminary structuring ensures both easy removal for consumers and reliable tamper evidence, as the bridges are engineered to fail at the exact moment of intended opening.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP3515829B1Double tamper evidence cap for a neck of a container, system including said cap and a container and method for manufacturing said cap
Publication Date: 2022.01.26 SOCIETE ANONYME DES EAUX MINERALES D EVIAN SAEME
  • EP3515829B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3515829B1 patent drawingFigure 2~2A
  • EP3515829B1 patent drawingFigure 2B

AI summary

The invention pertains to an improved container (e.g bottle) cap which is a single use leakproof closing, which shows obvious indications of an illicit opening and re-use, having a double level of tamperproof means. This cap is a screw cap (1) for a neck (2) of a bottle (3) comprising an upper part (4) removable from the neck (2) and a lower part (5) non-removable from the neck (2). Said lower non-removable part (5) is a tamper evidence band (TEB) linked to the bottom edge (12) of the cap's skirt (11) by annularly regularly distributed frangible connection bridges (13) which are designed to be broken at the first opening of the bottle by unscrewing and removal of the upper part (4) of the cap (1). Said TEB also displays any breaking in of the cap (1) before the first container (3) opening, thanks to additional lower markers (18).