Double-Wall Acoustic Window for Robust Ultrasound Probe Contact

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Ultrasonic probes face challenges in achieving high signal strength and accuracy due to acoustic window materials that reflect or attenuate ultrasonic waves, deform under pressure, and are prone to contamination, requiring materials with specific acoustic, mechanical, and chemical properties.

Innovation Solution

The acoustic window is designed with a convex surface and divergent wall portions, using thermoplastic polymers like polymethylpentene blended with elastomers, and a double wall structure to ensure uniform wave propagation, robustness, and chemical resistance, with a smooth transition to the probe case to prevent contamination.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the thickness of the acoustic window is increased to increase the robustness, then the robustness is improved, but the signal strength is reduced due to increased attenuation and reflection

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproverobustnessVSAvoidsignal strength
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The acoustic window is divided into two separate components: a thin acoustic window portion (0.1-0.5mm) for maintaining signal strength and a thicker protective case portion (1-3mm) for providing robustness. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized for its specific function without compromising the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The acoustic window uses a composite structure combining a thin acoustic window portion made of acoustic-compatible material with a protective case portion made of stronger material. This composite approach allows the system to achieve both good acoustic properties and mechanical robustness simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If a strong material is selected for the acoustic window to increase the robustness, then the robustness is improved, but the signal strength decreases due to poor acoustic compatibility

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproverobustnessVSAvoidsignal strength
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The acoustic window is divided into two separate components: a thin acoustic window portion (0.1-0.5mm) for maintaining signal strength and a thicker protective case portion (1-3mm) for providing robustness. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized for its specific function without compromising the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The acoustic window uses a composite structure combining a thin acoustic window portion made of acoustic-compatible material with a protective case portion made of stronger material. This composite approach allows the system to achieve both good acoustic properties and mechanical robustness simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If the acoustic window is pressed firmly against the abdomen to improve contact, then the contact quality is improved, but the deformation increases causing refraction and reducing image accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontact qualityVSAvoidimage accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The acoustic window uses a thin portion (0.1-0.5mm) that acts as a flexible shell, allowing it to conform to the curved surface of the abdomen while maintaining its structural integrity. This flexibility enables firm contact without excessive deformation that would cause refraction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The acoustic window is designed with a curved surface that matches the convex shape of the abdomen. This curved geometry allows the acoustic window to conform to the body surface, improving contact quality while minimizing deformation and refraction during pressing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

4Loss of energy

If the acoustic window is made thin to reduce attenuation and maintain signal strength, then the signal strength is improved, but the robustness and resistance to contamination decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal strengthVSAvoidrobustness
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The acoustic window is divided into two separate components: a thin acoustic window portion (0.1-0.5mm) for maintaining signal strength and a thicker protective case portion (1-3mm) for providing robustness. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized for its specific function without compromising the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The acoustic window uses a composite structure combining a thin acoustic window portion made of acoustic-compatible material with a protective case portion made of stronger material. This composite approach allows the system to achieve both good acoustic properties and mechanical robustness simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design maintains high signal strength, reduces deformation, and enhances durability and hygiene by minimizing contamination, while allowing for efficient manufacturing with reduced defects.

Implementation Method 1

The velocity of propagation through the acoustic window must be uniform and within a prescribed range

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectUltrasonic wave propagation: Sound

Implementation Method 2

the material of the acoustic window has poor acoustic compatibility with living tissue (water) and the acoustic window has the property of reflecting a large amount of ultrasonic waves from the surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic impedance matching: Reflection

Implementation Method 3

an acoustic lens that focuses ultrasonic waves generated from the ultrasonic transducer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectUltrasonic wave focusing: Lens

Implementation Method 4

The deformation of the acoustic window changes the distance between the transducer and the target organ

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Implementation Method 5

thermoplastic polymers like polymethylpentene blended with elastomers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectViscoelastic damping: Viscoelasticity

Implementation Method 6

the shape of the acoustic window may be designed to be thin in the elevation direction and have a smoothly curved surface to reduce pain to the target

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure distribution: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 7

the material of the acoustic window has poor acoustic compatibility with living tissue (water)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic impedance matching: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS20260009770A1Hard shell lens with double wall structure
Publication Date: 2026.01.08 GE PRECISION HEALTHCARE LLC
  • US20260009770A1 patent drawing
  • US20260009770A1 patent drawing
  • US20260009770A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An acoustic window including a convex surface that extends in an azimuth direction and contacts an examination target, and a first wall portion and a second wall portion that extend divergently from each other. At least a portion of the first wall portion is provided along an inner surface of the probe case, and the second wall portion has an outer surface that is contiguous with the convex surface.