Double-Wall Dry-Stacked Block Structure for Wind and Impact Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for constructing fence and parapet walls using dry-stacked concrete blocks face challenges such as difficulty in installation, high construction costs, insufficient resistance to wind-loading, and inadequate retention against vehicular traffic impact.

Innovation Solution

A double-wall structure composed of interconnected dry-stacked wall blocks with protuberances and grooves, where each succeeding course is set back relative to the preceding one, creating a converging design, and filled with loose stone for enhanced structural integrity, allowing for easy installation and resistance to wind and vehicular impacts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional dry-stacked concrete blocks are used for fence and parapet walls, then the walls are easy to install and inexpensive, but they have insufficient structural integrity and cannot resist wind-loading or vehicular impact forces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidwall structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The wall structure is divided into two separate back-to-back walls, each with its own foundation. This segmentation allows each wall to independently resist lateral forces while maintaining overall structural integrity, solving the problem of insufficient strength in conventional single-wall structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses composite construction by combining two separate wall structures back-to-back, creating a composite wall system that leverages the strength of both walls to resist wind-loading and vehicular impact forces, thereby improving overall structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If columns or piers are added to reinforce fence and parapet walls, then wind-loading and impact resistance improve, but construction costs increase and installation becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewind-loading resistanceVSAvoidconstruction ease
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges the reinforcement function into the wall structure itself by creating two back-to-back walls that mutually support each other. This eliminates the need for separate columns or piers, maintaining construction simplicity while achieving the desired wind-loading and impact resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

Each wall in the back-to-back configuration serves multiple functions: it provides the primary barrier function while simultaneously acting as a reinforcement element for the other wall. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for additional reinforcement elements, keeping construction easy and cost-effective.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Strength

If columns or piers are added to reinforce fence and parapet walls, then impact resistance improves, but construction costs increase and installation becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact resistanceVSAvoidconstruction ease
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement function is merged into the wall structure itself through the back-to-back configuration. The two walls mutually support each other against impact forces, eliminating the need for separate columns or piers and maintaining construction simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

Each wall serves as both a barrier and a reinforcement element for the other wall. This multi-functionality provides impact resistance without requiring additional elements, keeping the construction process simple and cost-effective.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Strength

If conventional single-wall structures are used, then construction is simple, but they cannot provide adequate retention function as a handrail or resist vehicular traffic impact

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveretention functionVSAvoidwall structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The structure is segmented into two back-to-back walls, where the configuration itself provides the retention function. The narrow gap between the walls creates a natural barrier that serves as an effective handrail, eliminating the need for separate handrail installations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The back-to-back wall configuration creates a composite structure that provides both retaining function and handrail function. The combined structure leverages the presence of two walls to create a narrow gap that naturally serves as a barrier, achieving multiple functions simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS8734060B1Double-wall structure comprised of interconnected dry-stacked wall blocks
Publication Date: 2014.05.27 E DILLON & CO
  • US8734060B1 patent drawing
  • US8734060B1 patent drawing
  • US8734060B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A double-wall structure, such as a fence wall or a parapet wall, has two back-to-back walls each constructed of successive courses of concrete wall blocks dry-stacked one atop another with each succeeding course set back relative to the immediately preceding course so that the two walls converge upwardly towards one another and are capped at the top by cap blocks. Each wall block has protuberances that protrude upwardly from the top face of the block and a groove provided in the bottom face thereof. The groove is located and dimensioned relative to the protuberances so that the grooves of wall blocks in each succeeding course engage with the protuberances of wall blocks in the immediately preceding course to establish the setback distance between abutting courses of wall blocks.