Dough Kneading State Detection Using Sensor Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems fail to determine the optimal kneading time for dough with precision, leading to poor-quality final products due to under-mixing or over-mixing, as the kneading time and mechanical work applied are critical for developing rheological properties, and existing sensor systems struggle to accurately monitor the kneading cycle in real time.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a kneading machine with sensors to continuously measure representative quantities during the kneading cycle, using a kneading state model defined through a learning phase to determine the kneading state and stop criterion, allowing for precise monitoring and automation of the kneading process, including a learning phase with test cycles to define and adapt the kneading stop criterion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional sensor systems are used to monitor kneading, then the system complexity is low, but the measurement precision of kneading state is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvekneading state detection accuracyVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring system is segmented into multiple independent sensor modules, each measuring specific physical quantities (power, temperature, speed, torque). This segmentation allows precise measurement of individual parameters while keeping each sensor module simple and maintainable, resolving the contradiction between measurement precision and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A processing unit acts as an intermediary that receives data from multiple simple sensors and computes the kneading state through mathematical models. This intermediary transforms simple sensor readings into precise kneading state information, achieving high measurement precision without requiring complex individual sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If kneading time is determined by operator experience, then the ease of operation is high, but the manufacturing precision of dough quality is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedough quality consistencyVSAvoidkneading process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically determining the optimal kneading stop point through real-time monitoring of physical quantities and comparison with reference values. The machine autonomously controls the kneading process without requiring operator expertise, achieving consistent dough quality while simplifying operation through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback by monitoring kneading parameters in real-time and comparing them against reference values obtained during a learning phase. This feedback mechanism automatically adjusts the kneading process to maintain optimal conditions, ensuring consistent dough quality without requiring operator intervention or complex manual adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If real-time monitoring of multiple physical quantities is implemented, then the manufacturing precision of kneading state determination is improved, but the use of energy and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvekneading completion accuracyVSAvoidenergy consumption for monitoring
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action during a learning phase where reference values for optimal kneading are established. This pre-acquired reference data enables accurate real-time monitoring without requiring continuous complex computations or additional sensors during actual production, reducing energy consumption while maintaining high precision in determining kneading completion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP3970499A1Method for determining a state of kneading of a dough, system for monitoring the state of kneading and kneading machine
Publication Date: 2022.03.23 VMI INC
  • EP3970499A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3970499A1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3970499A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present description relates to a method for determining the kneading state of a dough such as a cereal dough, the dough being configured to be kneaded in a kneading machine (1), the kneading machine (1) comprising a plurality of sensors (13, 15, 17) configured to measure quantities representative of the dough during a kneading cycle and at least one kneading tool, the method comprising the steps of: - collecting measurements of the quantities representative of the dough continuously during the kneading cycle; - determining a kneading state on the basis of a kneading state model defined according to the measurements of the representative quantities, the kneading state model being defined or adapted on the basis of a learning phase; - verifying the achievement of a kneading stop criterion based on the kneading state.